- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Ryan Matthews
Posted on 11/10/11 at 10:55 pm
Posted on 11/10/11 at 10:55 pm
So much for the 15-20 carries. 
Chargers O-line was terrible and they played from behind the whole game.
Chargers O-line was terrible and they played from behind the whole game. 
1
Posted on 11/10/11 at 11:27 pm to Hank Marducas
They use him completely the wrong way. If they used him as the primary back he'd be much more effective, but they don't. I honestly don't even know how they fricking use him.
Posted on 11/10/11 at 11:46 pm to Geauxld Finger
I think they held him back some since he had that groin injury a few weeks ago 
Posted on 11/10/11 at 11:59 pm to LooseCannon22282
quote:
I think they held him back some since he had that groin injury a few weeks ago
I don't that's the case. Tolbert didn't do much more. They didn't have the ball that much, and when they did, they were throwing.
Posted on 11/11/11 at 2:09 am to Hank Marducas
But both averaged five yards a pop albeit on only 6 and 7 carries, but you can only blame that on the play calling and shite defense.
Posted on 11/11/11 at 9:30 am to Datbayoubengal
Basically they got behind and Tolbert is the receiving back. How that makes sense I still don't know. Let's put the fat plodding runner out there over the quick elusive guy!?
He sucked because SD's oline was garbage and couldn't block, or couldn't protect.
He sucked because SD's oline was garbage and couldn't block, or couldn't protect.
Posted on 11/11/11 at 9:33 am to Geauxld Finger
I've had it with Mathews and actually started Greene over him this week. Hopefully he can get more than 7 points, but Greene sucks also so...
Posted on 11/11/11 at 9:41 am to Pierre
I have a backfield of Chris Johnson, Mathews, and Greene
I fricking hate it
I fricking hate it
Posted on 11/11/11 at 12:35 pm to Geauxld Finger
quote:
Basically they got behind and Tolbert is the receiving back. How that makes sense I still don't know. Let's put the fat plodding runner out there over the quick elusive guy!?
He sucked because SD's oline was garbage and couldn't block, or couldn't protect.
Matthews is the receiving back
Posted on 11/11/11 at 12:56 pm to MrPappagiorgio
quote:
I have a backfield of Chris Johnson, Mathews, and Greene
prayers sent.
Posted on 11/11/11 at 2:01 pm to lroach2
quote:
Matthews is the receiving back
Yea uhh no he isn't. RM is the 1st and 2nd down back. Neither one really has a definite role.
Posted on 11/11/11 at 7:38 pm to Geauxld Finger
quote:
They use him completely the wrong way. If they used him as the primary back he'd be much more effective, but they don't. I honestly don't even know how they fricking use him.
My god this. It's absurd.
And he should be their receiving back because not only does he catch well, he's very dangerous with the ball.
I thought Norv was a boob coming into this year, and now watching it first hand while following a player has confirmed it. That team sucks
Posted on 11/11/11 at 10:05 pm to LfcSU3520
Every word in this post is truth
Posted on 11/12/11 at 12:22 am to LfcSU3520
quote:
I thought Norv was a boob coming into this year, and now watching it first hand while following a player has confirmed it. That team sucks
I don't think the team sucks. Norv is fricking awful.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News