- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is this trade collusion? Opinions welcomed.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:08 am
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:08 am
This is a .5 PPR keeper league. I'll put their draft value for next year in parentheses...
Team A receives: Martin (5th), Ginn
Team B receives: Leveon (1st), Yeldon (4th), CJ2K
Team A receives: Martin (5th), Ginn
Team B receives: Leveon (1st), Yeldon (4th), CJ2K
11
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:13 am to gatordmb89
1. Your opinion of draft value is subjective.
2. I don't have a problem with this trade.
2. I don't have a problem with this trade.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:16 am to dualed
Would also need complete roster and standings to have an honest opinion.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:20 am to gatordmb89
Leveon is out for the year.
So, Doug Martin and Ginn for Yeldon and Chris Johnson. Have no idea why that looks like collusion.
So, Doug Martin and Ginn for Yeldon and Chris Johnson. Have no idea why that looks like collusion.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 8:41 am to dualed
I assume he's listing what the cost of keeping them would be, not guessing their actual adp next season.
Anyway, that trade looks fine.
Anyway, that trade looks fine.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:01 am to gatordmb89
Team A is going all out to try to win this year. Team B is trying to build for a win next year. Without seeing their records, which is relevant, I would guess that team A is looking pretty strong, and team B has just decided to throw in the towel. Or team B is just forward thinking. Either way.
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 9:02 am
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:13 am to gatordmb89
fair if not keeper. Keeper makes it questionable
This post was edited on 11/3/15 at 9:16 am
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:15 am to dualed
1) no, that is the round they would be kept in next year.
2) I don't see it as collusion either.
2) I don't see it as collusion either.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:15 am to gatordmb89
Don't think I'd call it collision, but the trade is not "completely fair", as some people ITT have stated. Team A is getting the business IMO.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:16 am to Peazey
Team A= 3-5
Team B= 5-3
Team B= 5-3
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:20 am to gatordmb89
I don't like keeper. Team A can say screw it I am not playing in this league next year anyway.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 9:44 am to gatordmb89
Team A is pretty damn stupid then. That's pretty puzzling.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:15 am to gatordmb89
No
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:29 am to gatordmb89
Not Collusion. Team A is trying to win this year or at least keep his name in the discussion.
Team B is just a wheeling and dealing fool who made a great play for next year while also acquiring decent production for this year.
Team B knows what he is doing but the trade is not lopsided to the point where collusion should be a factor.
Team B is just a wheeling and dealing fool who made a great play for next year while also acquiring decent production for this year.
Team B knows what he is doing but the trade is not lopsided to the point where collusion should be a factor.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:37 am to gatordmb89
As an aside, it find it irksome that these "collusion" threads never mention a crucial bit of information: what are the teams in question saying?
The absolute most important consideration in determining whether a trade should stand is what the teams themselves say they are trying to accomplish with the trade. If both sides have a reasonable, rational explanation, the trade should be upheld, even if you think they are making a mistake.
So, why don't you go and ask them?
The absolute most important consideration in determining whether a trade should stand is what the teams themselves say they are trying to accomplish with the trade. If both sides have a reasonable, rational explanation, the trade should be upheld, even if you think they are making a mistake.
So, why don't you go and ask them?
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:41 am to gatordmb89
The real question is what is the punishment for coming in last place? Giving up Bell for next year may be worth dunking his nuts in icy hot.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 10:59 am to tigerskin
quote:
fair if not keeper. Keeper makes it questionable
Questionable? As in questionable that you think these two owners are cheating? You see, that's the problem with this. There arent enough logical people in this world to determine what is and isnt cheating. This obviously isnt cheating.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 11:51 am to dnm3305
No, not cheating. Just throwing in the towel for next year and moving on. Questionable probably isn't right word. Agree it isn't collusion. And support for why I don't play keeper.
Posted on 11/3/15 at 12:05 pm to gatordmb89
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News