- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Votecstr has Clinton up by 2.7% in CO with roughly 58% in.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:11 pm
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:11 pm
538 had her winning by 2.9%. Looks like an early sign that the polls were right.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:12 pm to demtigers73
58% of the people have voted by noon out there? Interesting
538 Jeeezzzzzz. They are as slanted as CNN
538 Jeeezzzzzz. They are as slanted as CNN
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:12 pm to demtigers73
RePublican voters haven't gotten off work to go vote yet.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:12 pm to mule74
They don't have actual votes, they are simulating. May be right, but they clearly say in disclaimer this is a beta, and votes are estimates.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:12 pm to mule74
No way to know until the actual votes are released.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:12 pm to mule74
Votcstr doesn't even know who is on the ballot.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:13 pm to mule74
Get this shite outta here. It's intentionally misleading.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:13 pm to mule74
The Republicans will have to wait until they get off work to vote
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:13 pm to mule74
quote:
538 had her winning by 2.9%. Looks like an early sign that the polls were right.
Do a projection based on polls...polls were right.
Seems legit.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:13 pm to mule74
we shouldn't pay much attention to these early numbers. I'd love for them to be correct, but it's silly to take these too seriously right now.
It reminds me too much of early exit polling data in 2004 that skewed heavily in favor of Kerry... got me all excited and them made me sorrowful that evening with all my Bush friends.
Don't pay attention to these numbers.
From 538:
It reminds me too much of early exit polling data in 2004 that skewed heavily in favor of Kerry... got me all excited and them made me sorrowful that evening with all my Bush friends.
Don't pay attention to these numbers.
From 538:
quote:
HARRY ENTEN 1:30 PM
Don’t Believe Everything You Read We’re now three and a half hours until we get our first look at exit poll data. That data is currently under quarantine. I remember a time, however, when that data could leak it out. Back in 2004, the very first wave of exit polls suggested by mid-afternoon that Democrat John Kerry was well on his way to defeating Republican President George W. Bush.
Many people believed that the exits were right, and it even caused massive movement in the stock market. It turned out that the data was wrong. The exit polls overestimated Kerry’s support, and Bush went on to to win a small but comfortable victory. That should serve as a lesson both at 5 p.m. and now.
We won’t know who is going to win until the votes are actually counted. Don’t believe in reports you read online that supposedly give you a keen insight of who is going to win. No one knows.
This post was edited on 11/8/16 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:13 pm to philter
Estimate. AKA they made it say what they wanted it to say. OPs melt will be fabulous.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:14 pm to GeneralLee
I love all of these simulations and exit polls... NEWSFLASH You'll know the actual result tonight. Stop thinking you are nostradamus.
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:14 pm to Uncs
quote:this.
58% of the people have voted by noon out there? Interesting
No way 58% of precincts are reporting
Posted on 11/8/16 at 1:15 pm to mule74
So many fricking retards today. It's a fricking simulation.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News