- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Jerry Markbreit Gives the Definition of a Football Move
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:46 pm
quote:
"When a catch is made by a receiver who comes down with both feet on the ground, the "football move" would be: stretching for a first down, diving out-of-bounds or running with the ball. If the "football move" is accomplished, and the receiver is then hit and the ball comes out, it is ruled a catch and fumble, instead of an incomplete forward pass."
Clear catch imo, and even if not, you certainly can't tell me it was indisputable that he didn't make a football move.
8
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:47 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
"When a catch is made by a receiver who comes down with both feet on the ground
lol
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:47 pm to LordoftheManor
Boom.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:47 pm to LordoftheManor
See Pereira.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:47 pm to LordoftheManor
Yep Boys got fricked over, we just got to accept it and move on. Can't expect to win games on a call.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:47 pm to LordoftheManor
Packers win. Romo chokes.
All is right in the world.
All is right in the world.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:48 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
stretching for a first down
based on this?
that is a stretch (pun not intended)
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:49 pm to LordoftheManor
"When a catch is made by a receiver who comes down with both feet on the ground, the "football move" would be: stretching for a first down"
Yep, as I've been saying past precedent has almost always ruled a play like Bryant's a catch. This "but he was falling" nonsense has not factored in in the past when the player who was falling made a football move.
Yep, as I've been saying past precedent has almost always ruled a play like Bryant's a catch. This "but he was falling" nonsense has not factored in in the past when the player who was falling made a football move.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:49 pm to LordoftheManor
Jesus Christ make it stop, Fred needs to come in here and do work
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:50 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
based on this?
that is a stretch (pun not intended)
No it isn't. He was reaching for the end zone. And again, not indisputable.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:53 pm to TH03
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:55 pm to LordoftheManor
quote:
No it isn't. He was reaching for the end zone. And again, not indisputable.
not enough for it to be a football move. He may have stretched it an inch or two forward. Plus this is a judgment call, Mike Pereira who was a former VP of officiating in the NFL, agreed with the call.
Again what is the definition of a stretch? putting your hands out fully while going for a TD or first down, or any move forward of the ball while falling. But what ever, I'm going to side with Pereira on this one.
Posted on 1/11/15 at 3:57 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
not enough for it to be a football move.
Indisputable? Not a chance.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News