Sampras vs. Federer in their primes at Wimbledon

frick you

Indubitably.

I am a huge Fedtard and never liked Pete (but I do appreciate him now). I truly believes Pete's A+ game, especially at Wimbledon, is half a notch better than Fed's. You just flat couldn't touch his serve some days, like the 1999 final against peak Agassi.

Some of this might come down to '90's grass (faster) versus '02-present grass (recipe was changed and the courts slowed down a bit). Pete has a better net game, Fed is probably a better all around game (though Pete was no slouch from the baseline and did blow Agassi off the court from the baseline some days).

If they play with the faster grass from the 90s, Sampras probably wins. At the top of his game his serve was untouchable.

Don't know why because they were both bang bang...but Mac was so much more fun to watch than Sampras...(and not the antics.)

I know a Mac vs. Borg movie is coming out but Mac vs. Lendle was my generation and so dynamic. Lendle was a baseline machine - always reaching for that sawdust...Mac was an artist.

Sampras was more power. Mac just played the angles like chess...and going against Lendle who just beat you into submission...it was a joy to watch. Mac said that he needed Borg and missed him but Lendle was probably Borgs heir.

But as for full mastery of the sport - it's Fed.

Ok what if 90s grass and Roddick?

Would his serve be returnable?