Started By
Message

Could injury to Saints Max Unger lead to Mark Ingram trade....link

Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:05 am
Posted by Dennis4LSU
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Sep 2008
4481 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:05 am
https://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2017/05/could_injury_to_saints_max_unger_lead_to_mark_ingr.htmlThis could get interesting. I say there is probably nothing to it
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 8:08 am
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24650 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:08 am to
Get him
Posted by sicboy
Because Awesome
Member since Nov 2010
77649 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:09 am to
I like Ingram but might as well. We so under utilize the run game anyways, it's not like we'll really notice the difference. And if we're lucky, we'll get a shadow of the old Peterson.
Posted by mpar98
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2006
8034 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:12 am to
Don't interpret this as if it has any traction...its just an opinion piece.
Posted by windshieldman
Member since Nov 2012
12818 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:15 am to
I would hope Saints don't do like this board and turn into a bunch of delicate teardrops and panic. We don't even know his exact injury. Can he not even walk for next 6 months or will it be 6 months until he'd be in football shape? We have guys that can handle C until he is back, depending on how recovery is. You don't panic over a freaking C in May.
This post was edited on 5/8/17 at 8:15 am
Posted by Bengaltyger4life
Lafayette, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2014
423 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:17 am to
Sounds like a good deal to me
Posted by NOSHAU
Member since Feb 2012
11961 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 8:58 am to
Just fishing. The smart thing would be to sign Mangold, but would he come knowing that he could be gone in 6-8 weeks?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64463 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:10 am to
I would take a good hard look at Mangold before touching that deal first.
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:21 am to
fricking stupid. So you trade for a C on a 4 year deal because ours who is on a 3 year deal may miss 4-6 weeks?

I don't think we should get Mangold either, but IF we were to do something it sure in the frick would be that route over trading for someone with a large long term deal. Again, that's fricking stupid.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30111 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:45 am to
trade AP for him, don't see why it needs to be ingram other then the ST hate for him.

the eagles sound like they are borderline maybe even ready toi release the guy anyway so I don't think it takes much in trade to get him
Posted by rubberneck
NOLA
Member since Aug 2011
1040 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 12:24 pm to
Eff that! Senio or Jack Allen should fill in.

Its not even determined if Unger will even miss a game.
Posted by BlackTiger89
Member since Sep 2016
799 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 1:37 pm to
We have a center Udf out of southern miss and he pretty good give it time
Posted by JazzyJeff
Japan
Member since Sep 2006
3938 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:07 pm to
Trading Ingram would be stupid and it would piss AP off as well.

Ingram is coming of his best year yet and AP would like to NOT be the featured back but to spell Ingram when needed and not get beat to shite like his did at Minnesota.
Posted by knowingabyss
Vermont
Member since Aug 2016
2700 posts
Posted on 5/8/17 at 9:19 pm to
Unless the Eagles are giving us at least a 2nd round pick for Ingram, I'm not interested in trading a solid, young RB for an injured C who would be a backup after a month.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram