- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Your occasional reminder that global warming is real,
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:01 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:01 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
Thanks for the reminder!!
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:02 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Your occasional reminder that global warming is real,
quote:But warming is real
record low
Posted on 1/12/17 at 10:55 pm to Dale51
quote:
And before 450 years ago??
*most of those instances happened on isolated environments...not to be confused with a general loss of weak species*
Your point? It is obvious that the introductions of invasive species, loss of habitat, and hunting species to extinction will impact isolated environments heavily.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 11:48 pm
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:20 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
How many times has here been a record low and a record high in the same week
In English and with context please...
quote:
pig fricker
Wow, I'm hurt...no really I am, but are you sure you're not projecting?
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:20 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
How many times has here been a record low and a record high in the same week, pig fricker? (Hint: it hasn't happened)
It has happened many times on the same day in the U.S., within the same week even more frequently.
LINK
"There may be many locations in Hawaii, Florida, and Pacific Coastal areas that have experienced record highs and lows on the same day that I am unaware of. This is because they are so unremarkable and consequently go unnoticed or unreported. Here are a handfull I do know about:
Eureka, California on September 23, 2006 from 42° to 82° (40°)
Vero Beach, Florida on September 14, 2005 from 70° to 92° (22°)
Olympia, Washington on March 14, 2005 from 25° to 67° (42°)
Hilo, Hawaii on May 25, 2003 from 60° to 91° (31°)
Hilo, Hawaii on May 26, 2003 from 60° to 88° (28°)
Melbourne, Florida on May 22, 1998 from 68° to 97° (29°)
San Francisco (airport) on December 23, 1990 from 28° to 64° (36°)
Astoria, Oregon on March 15, 1988 from 28° to 61° (33°)
Miami, Florida on August 11, 1984 from 70° to 96° (26°)
Posted on 1/12/17 at 11:28 pm to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:for this reason God will send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie, 12 that they all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
global warming
Posted on 1/13/17 at 12:40 am to NC_Tigah
quote:You do know that positive feedback and runaway feedback are not the same thing, right?
Your contention is atmospheric CO2 drives temperature. Increased temperature increases atmospheric concentration at equilibrium. As the contention hold CO2 to be a major (even catastrophic) warming agent, escalation of atmospheric CO2 in that circumstance would be unfettered.
For purposes here, given your equation where all variables are terrestrial, there would be no off-switch.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:05 am to Iosh
quote:Fortunately, otherwise we'd be an iteration of Venus.
You do know that positive feedback and runaway feedback are not the same thing, right?
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:22 am to NC_Tigah
So if you're aware of the fact that positive feedback leads to asymptotic saturation (at about 10°C warming, theoretically) and not Venus 2.0 what do you mean by "no off-switch"?
This post was edited on 1/13/17 at 1:24 am
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:50 am to Iosh
quote:So does an open atmosphere, in theory.
So if you're aware of the fact that positive feedback leads to asymptotic saturation
quote:With CO2 causing warming, resulting in further CO2 release from oceanic reservoirs, in turn further driving atmospheric concentration, causing further warming . . . what's the "off-switch"?
what do you mean by "no off-switch"?
Posted on 1/13/17 at 1:57 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Technology will move us off of a carbon-based energy economy in the next 50-75 years. This is all a moot point.
Any drastic changes we make will be horrible for our economy and have little to no affect on the problem (if there even is one).
So gas up and don't worry about
Pretty much. People are freaking out about nothing. The world will be just fine.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 3:59 am to RogerTheShrubber
Were not concerned about the earth not surviving and you know that. You do this in every climate debate.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 6:42 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Guess what I'm a Republican Trump voter. It's still real. Sorry.
We need to proceed with whatever abatement we can, if it is real or not. We just can't assume it is not a thing.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 7:21 am to EA6B
quote:
ureka, California on September 23, 2006 from 42° to 82° (40°)
Vero Beach, Florida on September 14, 2005 from 70° to 92° (22°)
Olympia, Washington on March 14, 2005 from 25° to 67° (42°)
Hilo, Hawaii on May 25, 2003 from 60° to 91° (31°)
Hilo, Hawaii on May 26, 2003 from 60° to 88° (28°)
Melbourne, Florida on May 22, 1998 from 68° to 97° (29°)
San Francisco (airport) on December 23, 1990 from 28° to 64° (36°)
Astoria, Oregon on March 15, 1988 from 28° to 61° (33°)
Miami, Florida on August 11, 1984 from 70° to 96° (26°)
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 20° to 82° in the middle of January (62°). It's totally unnatural and anyone with an ounce of common sense knows it if they aren't totally blinded by political ideology or clinical denial. Get your heads out of your asses.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 7:36 am to LSUTigersVCURams
Wanna know how God has a sense of humor?
He allows selected idiots to think man can significantly influence the climate of a planet!!
He allows selected idiots to think man can significantly influence the climate of a planet!!
Posted on 1/13/17 at 7:44 am to Crow Pie
Look at yourself, wearing your willful ignorance like a badge of honor. It's sickening.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 7:51 am to Loserman
quote:
The greenies would be really pissed to watch my family swimming all winter in our 42000 gallon heated pool.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 7:56 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Look at yourself, wearing your willful ignorance like a badge of honor. It's sickening.
What is your final solution for the numerous people who refuse to adopt your orthodoxy?
Imprisonment? Torture? Death?
Posted on 1/13/17 at 8:00 am to TrueTiger
Such an idiotic comment. Yeah, you're such a victim. Some of us just hate to see people living in willful ignorance about a topic that is so important.
Posted on 1/13/17 at 8:03 am to LSUTigersVCURams
quote:
Baton Rouge, Louisiana 20° to 82° in the middle of January (62°). It's totally unnatural and anyone with an ounce of common sense knows it if they aren't totally blinded by political ideology or clinical denial.
There are plenty of good arguments to make to get your point across, but this is not one of them.
There are plenty of other weather related factoids that could "prove" the opposite.
Instead of talking about this as if it's a religion and the people who disagree with you are blasphemers, perhaps a legit discussion on the actually effects of global warming over the next 50 years. Hint: All of the projected results are not bad.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News