re: Your occasional reminder that global warming is real,

quote:

---

and caused by human emissions of greenhouse gasses.

Go outside you ignorant sluts. Record cold and record high temps in the same week.

Once you admit there is a problem, you will be able to be part of the solution.

---

WE AGREE THAT THE PLANET IS WARMING TODAY. WE DISAGREE ABOUT THE REASON WHY. It was 22 degrees here last week. It has not been that cold here in years. THAT WAS NOT CAUSED BY GLOBAL WARMING OR HUMANS. Please read these links to understand. (During the "end times" the weather will change. If we are in the end times, there is no solution. The weather will change. Nothing can prevent it. Enjoy the 70 degree weather and drive with the top down)

LINK
It was gratifying when several scientists agreed that global warming had stalled and thus falsified computer climate models.

LINK /
Curry is known for her scientifically astute explanations of the uncertainties in climate science.

LINK
Why have most of the planets in our Solar System been warming the same time the earth has warmed? Did you find life on this planets driving SUVs and generating power?
ASTROMETRIA explains what is happening outside of our planet which affects the temperature of our planet. This is the most credible study in existence explaining this. If you find a better one that is credible, post it.

Princeton Professor Dr Will Happer

Increasing CO2

I think I need a truck... A really really big one and lots of black smoke.

quote:

---

CO2 driving temperature doesn't "require" an off switch. Temperature characteristics within our biosphere do. The result is a plummet to glaciation. The process is repetitive, cyclical, and substantially predates any anthropogenic influence.

---

So what?

You never get around to explaining why the ice cores and the paleo record are relevant. I've asked you directly if you are attempting to use them to prove that temperature is currently driving CO2, and you've said you aren't. Such a conclusion is obviously not tenable given that CO2 levels are already 100ppm higher than the interglacial peaks, and given that the pace of warming is substantially faster than in the ice core records, where even a single pixel on the X axis represents millenia.

But if that's not the purpose of citing the ice core records, what is? It is trivially true that temperature led CO2 during prehistoric glaciation. This is not in the least controversial. The physical laws have been known since the 19th century and the ice cores are discussed at length in the IPCC. It's a positive feedback cycle that can be driven from either end. More CO2 means higher temps, and higher temps mean more CO2.

But current climate change doesn't match the ice core pattern at all, otherwise we would be seeing millenia-scale cooling, not century-scale warming.

quote:

---

IDGAF if global warming is real or not. I just think its hilarious that the left's solution is MOAR TAXES!!!

---

No the solution is MOAR NUCLEAR. MOAR RESEARCH INTO BATTERY TECHNOLOGY. The solution is LESS BURNING FOSSIL FUELS.