Started By
Message

re: Your occasional reminder that global warming is real,

Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:56 pm to
Posted by RockyMtnTigerWDE
War Damn Eagle Dad!
Member since Oct 2010
105541 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:56 pm to
Go to hell Liar

Man does have an effect on climate, but it is so insignificant it does not call for harsh and extreme measures pushed by you retarded environmental nut jobs.
Posted by stampman
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
4923 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:59 pm to
I heard through reliable scientific sources that dinosaurs were made extinct by auto fumes!
Posted by stampman
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
4923 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

I was just making fun of the OP's post.



Yep...when the ice cubes in my freezer start thawing, then I'll get worried!
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:01 pm to
quote:


Link?

I really dont care either way if it's real or not. This Earth has survived long enough on its own.



Well, the life on earth is going extinct at a pretty extreme rate..
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27222 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:03 pm to
I have no idea what race you are. I simply think you are a stereotypical bigoted liberal.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Guess things have to get a little more unstable before we fix our shite.


What do you mean "more" unstable??
Can you point out some of the "unstable" things you see?
Just curious.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

They trust Fox News more than scientists that have dedicated their lives to research


Which scientists are these? Can you name some of them?
thanks.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
27222 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

No and thats a stupid question. So is "can someone tell me what the temperature is supposed to be?? lol!!!11!"


Why is this a stupid question?

Assuming that the Earth's temperature during the current age is the ideal number is very arrogant and presumptuous. It's akin to believing we are the only life in the universe.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:27 pm to
quote:


Which scientists are these? Can you name some of them?


LINK

This is probably a good starting point given that the vast majority aren't paid for their efforts.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 5:28 pm
Posted by stampman
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
4923 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

What do you mean "more" unstable??
Can you point out some of the "unstable" things you see?
Just curious.



I haven't seen an iceberg floating past BR in quite a while so global warming must really be true!
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:29 pm to
quote:

Well, the life on earth is going extinct at a pretty extreme rate..


bullshite.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

This is probably a good starting point given that the vast majority aren't paid for their efforts.


IPCC??...you're joking, right? Wasn't the IPCC the Al Gore, Maurice Strong and that weird looking train engineer/porno writer Paruchi's (sp) con organization that has been part of creating all those loaded...and proven wrong... computer models??
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124547 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

Not on net, because the outgassing of CO2 FROM the oceans driven by temperature will be dominated by the direct addition TO the oceans from increased partial pressure.
Right, that's relevant as to concentrations in equilibrium at a given temperature.

Your contention is atmospheric CO2 drives temperature. Increased temperature increases atmospheric concentration at equilibrium. As the contention hold CO2 to be a major (even catastrophic) warming agent, escalation of atmospheric CO2 in that circumstance would be unfettered.

For purposes here, given your equation where all variables are terrestrial, there would be no off-switch.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:05 pm to
quote:


bullshite.


you disagree that we are losing species to extinction because of human development?
Posted by stinkdawg
Savannah, smoking by the gas cans
Member since Aug 2014
4072 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:15 pm to
I find it odd that the doom and gloom scientists are payed by the Gov.
If a government wanted to push an agenda, say to run up fuel and power prices. Then they would need scientists to pull it off. Strong arm scientists with 95% of funding and profit.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:29 pm to
quote:


Your contention is atmospheric CO2 drives temperature. Increased temperature increases atmospheric concentration at equilibrium. As the contention hold CO2 to be a major (even catastrophic) warming agent, escalation of atmospheric CO2 in that circumstance would be unfettered.

For purposes here, given your equation where all variables are terrestrial, there would be no off-switch.


isn't that what most are climate change proponents are afraid of? a positive feedback loop
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:31 pm to
quote:

I really hate the anti-intellectual arm of the right.
They trust Fox News more than scientists that have dedicated their lives to research




hahahahahahahahaha

scientists who make their money off government grants

Guess what, if what you are studying is a "crisis" you get bigger grants.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:32 pm to
quote:

you disagree that we are losing species to extinction because of human development



That wasn't the claim.
That said...so what? species come and go based on their ability to adapt to nature. We are part of nature.

You disagree with that? :rotflmao:
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 6:32 pm
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:35 pm to
quote:

isn't that what most are climate change proponents are afraid of? a positive feedback loop

No. They are afraid of everything (actually thats what they want you to think)

The "climate in crisis" shtick has been going on.. mostly perpetrated by the same people.. for half a century.

Can you name one (1) of their predictions that have come true in that 50 years?
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46611 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Once you admit there is a problem, you will be able to be part of the solution.


Over 12,000 posts in 2 1/2 yrs, quit posting and be part of the solution.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram