Started By
Message

re: Your occasional reminder that global warming is real,

Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:49 pm to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52945 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

These aren't part of the theory. They are estimates and assumptions. They can be wrong a million times but if the theory is still right, which it is and is holding, then we should at least pay attention.



Who's not paying attention. The basis of the OP is that anyone that doubts the left's claim of GW is a science denier. Well, only an idiot would consider that black and white.

Is our climate changing? Sure. Is it all due to man made global warming? Absolutely not. Does man impact climate? Of course. I think the argument is to the amount of impact man has on our climate. Don't think too many here deny that man doesn't impact the earth. Most of us just don't think it's as dire as the left paints it. Most also believe that the Earth is able to adapt to any species inhabiting it. And most believe that we should be good stewards of the Earth, regardless of what study is put out there.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16816 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Like exiting an ice age?


Yep. There are many things that effect the climate over time. Ocean currents and atmospheric composition are two of the biggest contributors. If either one changes more rapidly than at any point in history, you can expect the climate to react more quickly than at any point in history.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 3:55 pm
Posted by olddawg26
Member since Jan 2013
24634 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Is our climate changing? Sure. Is it all due to man made global warming? Absolutely not. Does man impact climate? Of course. I think the argument is to the amount of impact man has on our climate. Don't think too many here deny that man doesn't impact the earth. Most of us just don't think it's as dire as the left paints it. Most also believe that the Earth is able to adapt to any species inhabiting it. And most believe that we should be good stewards of the Earth, regardless of what study is put out there.





Well this is extremely rational. What about the multiple posters who jump on these threads saying "so what if its real?" or "I can't wait to burn more tires to speed up this bullshite"? I think you're being incredibly generous of the mentality of this board and immediate rejection of any sort of rationality when it comes to this subject. It's an immediate AL GORE SAID BLAH BLAH and then shut down any conversation.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124306 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:06 pm to
quote:

Well, heck, if we're posting graphs of global temperatures I'll add mine, too.....

Ouch! That's gonna leave a mark.
Posted by j bro12
LA
Member since Jan 2012
1550 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:07 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124306 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

All of those peaks and valleys. It's as if weather is cyclical.
Indeed.

Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52945 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:09 pm to
quote:

What about the multiple posters who jump on these threads saying "so what if its real?" or "I can't wait to burn more tires to speed up this bullshite"?


Those people are purposefully messing with you. It's not that hard to see.

quote:

I think you're being incredibly generous of the mentality of this board and immediate rejection of any sort of rationality when it comes to this subject.


I'm not above stating that when thread #10,000 is posted on here like the OP posted, stating that the weather in S. louisiana for the past week is definitive proof of global warming. When being presented with stupidity, you can either argue until your blue in the face, in front of an idiot that will never learn, or you just deliberately mess with them so that they keep going off that cliff. The latter is way more entertaining.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16816 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Most of us just don't think it's as dire as the left paints it. Most also believe that the Earth is able to adapt to any species inhabiting it.


I'd actually be more concerned about the acidification of the oceans from CO2 before I worry about warming. If creatures can't develop shells, entire food chains gets disrupted. species go extinct. etc

Can you imagine Louisiana without shrimp and crabs? The horror!!!!
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 4:15 pm
Posted by Errerrerrwere
Member since Aug 2015
38440 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:13 pm to
I bet you're a hoot to hang out with IRL.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
21871 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:15 pm to
quote:

They trust common sense more than scientists that have dedicated their lives to obtaining research grants purely in the interest of career self-preservation



Fify clown.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 4:19 pm
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16816 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:16 pm to
My wife thinks so. That says something I guess.
This post was edited on 1/12/17 at 4:19 pm
Posted by TheFonz
Somewhere in Louisiana
Member since Jul 2016
20496 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:17 pm to
I don't deny that the climate is changing. I just believe that we overestimate our contribution to it, as well as being able to do anything to stop it. We can do stuff on a local level- that's been proven with the cleaning of lakes, replanting forests, etc. but on a global scale, earth is gonna do what Earth is gonna do.

I do my part by eating as many cows as possible to keep them from farting.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
52945 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:18 pm to
quote:

I'd actually be more concerned about the acidification of the oceans from CO2 before I worry about warming. If creatures can't develop shells, entire food chains gets disrupted. species go extinct. etc

Can you imagine Louisiana without shrimp and crabs? The horror!!!!




This is the kind of stuff i was referring to when i mentioned the OP's failed attempts at sensationalism.
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16816 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

This is the kind of stuff i was referring to when i mentioned the OP's failed attempts at sensationalism.


Are you suggesting ocean acidification is more sensational than climate change? It's much easier to predict scientifically, and it's happened before.
Posted by Tigerdev
Member since Feb 2013
12287 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:32 pm to
Act like you been there before then! Acting like an Aggie
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21980 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

I'm burning fossil fuels & eating beef as fast as I fricking can!!!


The greenies would be really pissed to watch my family swimming all winter in our 42000 gallon heated pool.

Posted by AUbagman
LA
Member since Jun 2014
10575 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:40 pm to
quote:

This is coming from an American actually. That's your problem.


My problem? If you can't see you're one of the worst offenders, your bias is beyond reproach from self-introspect.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124306 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Henry's law assumes that a system is at equilibrium. If the temperature is raised and all else stays equal, then we would see considerable outgassing. But currently, the system is not at equilibrium, because the temperature is rising AND we're continuing to add more CO2 to the atmosphere.
The system is not at equilibrium. That was the point. So if CO2 is the major force driving temp upwards, thermal oceanic outgassing will result, and atmospheric concentration must increase.

The importance of equilibrium is anthropogenic CO2 will be terrestrially distributed in accordance, i.e., seawater acidification. But again, variance in ice core CO2 over time within a temperature range allows direct observation of the atmospheric component in a complex biosphere.

It simply is not a single variable equation. The challenge is biospheric complexity. Along with related albedo, solar variance, time horizon, etc, that complexity accounts for the repeated predictive modeling errors we've seen.
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15554 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:53 pm to
The Silesian and Pre-Cambrian epochs call bullshite on your theory.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 1/12/17 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

So if CO2 is the major force driving temp upwards, thermal oceanic outgassing will result,
Not on net, because the outgassing of CO2 FROM the oceans driven by temperature will be dominated by the direct addition TO the oceans from increased partial pressure.

We know this is the case because that's what the actual data show. CO2 concentration is increasing in both the atmosphere AND the ocean.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram