- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
You said roads were easy to build. Let private companies do it.
The construction of a road is much more complex than some some guy laying down asphalt.
The construction of a road is much more complex than some some guy laying down asphalt.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:03 pm to MrLarson
quote:
So you want to hand over eminent domain to private companies to build roads? Where would that go wrong?
Loaded question much?
Nobody has said anything about giving the power of the state to a private company to build roads.
Because that wouldn't be private roads, would it?
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:03 pm to MrLarson
if you couldn't secure the right of way, then you don't get to build the road
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if you couldn't secure the right of way, then you don't get to build the road
Novel concept.
I'll take it.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:14 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
if it's so obvious that private industry is better, why are Americans always raving about how great the Autobahn is than US roads?
That's your argument for government?
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:17 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
That being said, I don't see how the taxpayers simply hand money to private companies. Some entity has to collect the funds.
Well, by contract with a collections agency, the government can't swoop in and re allocate those funds to their personal pet projects.
I'm encouraged, phase out government, and hire a financial agency to handle collections and distributions of money.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:18 pm to MrLarson
quote:
You said roads were easy to build. Let private companies do it.
they do
quote:
The construction of a road is much more complex than some some guy laying down asphalt.
Depending on the road.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
Hmmm, MAYBE the taxpayers could vote for someone to organize their money, evaluate companies, make a coherent plan for the city, and make the executive decision?
I wonder what you'd call that.
I wonder what you'd call that.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:22 pm to BugAC
quote:
they do
In conjunction with Federal/State/Local governments.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:22 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
Hmmm, MAYBE the taxpayers could vote for someone to organize their money, evaluate companies, make a coherent plan for the city, and make the executive decision?
i mean we're getting theoretical, but if people got together in a group to pool their resources? that's their right
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:23 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
I wonder what you'd call that.
Private companies
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
if you couldn't secure the right of way, then you don't get to build the road
You do understand that without eminent domain, building any infrastructure would be impossible.
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:24 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
You do understand that without eminent domain, building any infrastructure would be impossible.
that is not true
it would just cost more, possibly
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:25 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
You do understand that without eminent domain, building any infrastructure would be impossible.
False. But I like your matter of fact approach to the issue!
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:26 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
that is not true
it would just cost more, possibly
So all you have to do is offer more money to people, and they will let you have their land to build infrastructure?
Like, if you wanted to expand a parking lot for a hotel, and a little old lady had a claptrap house, say in Jersey, all you would have to do is offer her a couple million more than its worth and presto, you have your infrastructure?
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
it would just cost more
Who pays for that?
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:28 pm to cokebottleag
quote:
So all you have to do is offer more money to people, and they will let you have their land to build infrastructure?
well i mean everyone has a number
since we're talking in hypothetical, if somebody offered $1B for the right of way on your land, that would be accepted 100% of the time
now this would increase the cost of this road dramatically i'm sure, but we're just talking in hypothetical. since you said "impossible", i'm allowed to get extreme myself and prove that it's not "impossible". it's the opposite: it's guaranteed (assuming infinite money exists)
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:29 pm to MrLarson
quote:
Who pays for that?
whomever is taking the financial risk of the investment of building that road
Posted on 1/12/17 at 12:29 pm to MrCarton
quote:
False. But I like your matter of fact approach to the issue!
There will always, ALWAYS be someone who refuses to sell.
I get that in your precious fantasy, everyone would act rationally, the whole theorethical town gets together, and votes that yes, we need to build a road from mainstreet to 5th street, we need it badly. But Mary Ann Persimmon owns a house in the way, and she won't sell, no amount of money will make her sell, it's her dead aunt's property, and even though the town voted, she won't sell.
Then you never get the road.
This happens every time even WITH Eminent Domain.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News