Started By
Message

re: TOPS Update?

Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:32 am to
Posted by nicholastiger
Member since Jan 2004
43266 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:32 am to
TOPS days are numbered
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96068 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:34 am to
TOPS and the Flood have taught me two things:


Red blooded die hard small govt conservatives sure get mad when you take away their govt money.........
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 9:51 am
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37621 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:35 am to
TOPS should only be allowed for students to take part in majors that will put money back into the state or will have a significant impact on the state.

Education Majors
Engineering Majors
Science Majors
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7781 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 8:49 am to
TOPS should be a low interest loan with a forgiveness option if the recipient works five years in state in their chosen field post graduation. If you leave state you pay it back, if you don't graduate you pay it back, if your underwater basket weaving degree was a waste of money then you pay t back.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25265 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:25 am to
quote:

TOPS should be a low interest loan with a forgiveness option if the recipient works five years in state in their chosen field post graduation. If you leave state you pay it back, if you don't graduate you pay it back, if your underwater basket weaving degree was a waste of money then you pay t back.


If the state could sustain high paying jobs for its best students, you wouldn't need TOPS.
Posted by jamalsdeck
Member since Jul 2016
2818 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:28 am to
quote:

But dont worry, huge Medicaid expansion for deadbeats in this state


Which is still a sham.. and not even accepting people who should qualify.. so wtf is their issue.
Posted by baseballmind1212
Missouri City
Member since Feb 2011
3267 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:37 am to
Imagine my dismay when realizing that the demographic that on average pays a higher percentage of their earnings to the government than ANY other demographic gets pissed when their few chances of government assistance are taken away.

Posted by seeinspots
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2014
1101 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:43 am to
quote:

TOPS and the Flood have taught me two things: Red blooded die hard small govt conservatives sure get mad when you take away there govt money.........


This dude gets it.

Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7781 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:52 am to
quote:

If the state could sustain high paying jobs for its best students, you wouldn't need TOPS.


Kind of a catch 22, you need young talent for those jobs and jobs for the young talent. My solution would at least hold some/most of the young talent in state for 5 years. If STEM talent is abundant for five years then presumably higher paying jobs and opportunities would follow. Places like Texas had the talent that then brought the jobs and recruited out of state talent. Louisiana needs to try and retain some of that top level talent to begin bringing in the better jobs. I personally would be ok with extending the TOPS loan initiative to the top STEM students in Texas/Ark/MS with a seven year loan forgiveness plan. You can't have the jobs without the talent, keep the talent and make the jobs come to you, then you can begin reducing the program as needed to create added sustainability.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:53 am to
quote:

you're being inconsistent with your usual positions.



A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds.

Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25265 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 9:57 am to
quote:

Kind of a catch 22, you need young talent for those jobs and jobs for the young talent. My solution would at least hold some/most of the young talent in state for 5 years.


No it wouldn't. Most people would go to the school with the better network, get the higher paying job and come out ahead over taking a loan that requires indentured servitude in a market that pays lower wages almost across the board by profession. That's the challenge.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
7781 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:02 am to
quote:

therick711

What would your solution be? I am looking at the intent of the program and trying to find a way to leverage it's purpose while also recouping "wasted" funds. Good jobs won't magically pop up in an area known for talent flight.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25265 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:11 am to
quote:

What would your solution be? I am looking at the intent of the program and trying to find a way to leverage it's purpose while also recouping "wasted" funds. Good jobs won't magically pop up in an area known for talent flight.


All the pieces should work together. So the solution is a bit complicated.

I would cut the institutions eligible down (leaving the votech program separate). I would like to consolidate so we could use the money at less institutions and funnel the talent to fewer institutions (ideally one, but everyone would bitch if you did that).

I would raise the requirements. Functionally, the top third of Louisiana's high school students qualify. I would either make TOPS only apply to the top 10% or, I would have different awards that give some lesser percentage to those outside of the top 10%

I would be ok with requiring a payback if a degree isn't attained, but the program already does pretty well on that front. Only 11% don't finish with a degree (the percentage has gone down every year).

I would incentivize employers to hire products of Louisiana schools by giving them favorable treatment for tax purposes.

Finally, we need to improve the public schools in this state. Many people won't stay or won't come back because they will make the less or the same but know they have to pay to educate any children they have. Until we address that issue, we will continue educating Texas' workforce.

This is by no means comprehensive. Just a jumping off point. There are so many things that have to be and should be done to help fix what it took many years to screw up, we'd need to author a white paper to scratch the surface.
This post was edited on 10/27/16 at 10:14 am
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:13 am to
Well it is flood insurance correct? Like you pay for it and then if you need it you get it right? That's the deal?
Posted by cwarr14
up da bayou
Member since Oct 2013
386 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:15 am to
What the frick ever happened to just working a trade?? Electrician, Carpenter, Welder etc. Thats some damn good money workin on them pipelines welding. Best part.... no college required.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96068 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:16 am to
quote:

Well it is flood insurance correct? Like you pay for it and then if you need it you get it right? That's the deal?
No. Talking about the people who chose not to buy flood insurance for cheap, yet had their hand out for the govt to step in.....
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25265 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:17 am to
TOPS as currently imagined has a votech program. Nothing wrong with working a trade. It isn't going to create any jobs, though. You probably also don't want your top intellectual talent working a trade. They can be better deployed elsewhere.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25265 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:18 am to
quote:

No. Talking about the people who chose not to buy flood insurance for cheap, yet had their hand out for the govt to step in.....



If you want a bunch of homeless people by you, great. The reality of the situation is that if you don't give them a hand, they'll get it and much more from the social welfare system.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96068 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:19 am to
That's fine. I just find it noteworthy that people who hate govt assistance and programs, are actually for govt assistance and programs
Posted by Snipe
Member since Nov 2015
11029 posts
Posted on 10/27/16 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Yeah, people just don't understand Medicaid expansion. It's not your fault, you can't help it.




No the problem is we DO understand Medicd Expansion, and the financial implications on this state which is already hemoraging economically right now.

The real problem is the people who support it DON'T understand it, and the people who use it DGAF.

first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram