- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: MLB Trade Deadline Thread (8/1: Rangers acquire Lucroy and Jeffress)
Posted on 7/21/16 at 12:40 pm to Lester Earl
Posted on 7/21/16 at 12:40 pm to Lester Earl
Interesting
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:02 pm to therick711
quote:Not sure why you keep repeating this... They demand young players and prospects. Obviously, they require good prospects because these are two of the elite relievers in the game but still prospects.
If they demand front line starter value for them, they aren't going to move them.
They Yankees will move them if they determine they want to be sellers. Enough teams are looking for help and the impact of both of them helps a team shut down the end of the game. Especially when the bullpen is the most important in the postseason.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:05 pm to BCMCubs
@Ken_Rosenthal
Another source says the #WhiteSox were offered a "king's ransom" for Sale in the last 48 hours and responded with a flat "no."
Another source says the #WhiteSox were offered a "king's ransom" for Sale in the last 48 hours and responded with a flat "no."
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:05 pm to tduecen
White Sox are discussing becoming sellers now....
That would open up
Zach Duke
David Robertson
Adam Eaton
Melky Cabrera
That would open up
Zach Duke
David Robertson
Adam Eaton
Melky Cabrera
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:06 pm to tduecen
Makes sense. I thought either Dodgers or Rangers.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:08 pm to Jwho77
Well now that the Dodgers think Kershaw may need back surgery.... Plus everyone reporting they are going big that is who I assume.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:08 pm to tduecen
quote:
Not sure why you keep repeating this
Because they have been demanding packages equivalent to what teams have gotten for front line starters. Not sure what you are having a problem with.
This post was edited on 7/21/16 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:11 pm to tduecen
If the Red Sox were ever going to give up Moncada, it might be for Sale.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:11 pm to Lester Earl
quote:That .380 OBP and 125 OPS+ and 123 wRC+ and .352 wOBA tho.
Also Jon morosi reports the Cubs are looking at josh Redick
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:11 pm to therick711
quote:Where have you seen one demand? Because they wanted Schwarber? They didn't ask for Schwarber + 3 other MLB ready prospects. Schwarber is not Trout, Harper, etc he is not untouchable like some seem to think.
they have been demanding packages equivalent to what teams have gotten for front line starters
Outside of reports of their interest in him I have not seen 1 other "demand" mentioned by anyone and yes they will gain many talented prospects for Chapman and Miller if they decide to deal them.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:12 pm to Jwho77
quote:That would be a HUGE trade to say the least
If the Red Sox were ever going to give up Moncada, it might be for Sale.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:14 pm to Jwho77
Problem is the white Sox still think they are contenders. No way they move sale for anything until they decide they aren't
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:16 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:They fell below .500 and 7 games out of the WC2 spot.
No way they move sale for anything until they decide they aren't
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:18 pm to tduecen
They reportedly asked for Schwarber and Baez at one time and one of those two and Contreras as well. You seem to think that is reasonable for a bullpen arm, two major league ready position players with power for a back inning arm. Makes a ton of sense.
This post was edited on 7/21/16 at 1:22 pm
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:18 pm to tduecen
Exactly. They are no longer contenders. But they obviously believe they are if they are saying no to kings ransom like trades from the Dodgers and red Sox who probably contain packages of Urias and moncada
This post was edited on 7/21/16 at 1:19 pm
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:18 pm to tduecen
Yeah, the White Sox have 4 games with Detroit and 4 with the Cubs up next. That is quite likely the death knell for them, but they'll still have time to sell.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:24 pm to therick711
quote:I don't even remember reading that and by using google and typing in "Yankees ask for Baez and Schwarber" I get
hey reportedly asked for Schwarber and Baez at one time
quote:
According to the latest MLB rumors, the Cubs are scouting three relievers from the New York Yankees and they could offer Kyle Schwarber, Javier Baez and other prospects in a trade.
So, in other words, it was probably never mentioned just something someone brought up to stir up the pot. However, I would hope the Yankees do ask for both because you have to shoot for the moon.
quote:I think these are two of the best relief pitchers on the market and both are proven and effective. Schwarber has no position for the Cubs, the OF is set and he is a defensive liability. He would make a great DH/OF for the Yankees.
. You seem to think that is reasonable for a bullpen arm, two major league ready position players with power for a back inning arm.
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:26 pm to Jwho77
If the White Sox move either I would be surprised
Posted on 7/21/16 at 1:31 pm to tduecen
If they make a deal, it'd probably be with Quintana because their fans would riot if it's Sale. Optics.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News