Started By
Message

re: F U Espys and NBA

Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:00 am to
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83686 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:00 am to
Lebron and Wades parts were really well done

most people just had a problem with them naming off Mike Brown, Sterling, Trayvon, etc in the beginning

Posted by AlonsoWDC
Memphis, where it ain't Ten-a-Key
Member since Aug 2014
8793 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:08 am to
quote:

I hate ESPN political shite more than most but that speech was pretty decent.

They mentioned cops being killed, Orlando, black neighborhood violence, and asked athletes to use their influence to help rebuild violent communities.

Also, they requested to do it on their own. ESPN gave them permission but it was the idea of the players, who are 4 close friends.


What this person said.

My god you guys get so butthurt over the most nonexistent of insults.
Posted by ShamelessPel
Metairie
Member since Apr 2013
12726 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:11 am to
quote:

like I said, you're part of the problem


Setting up a straw man? Congratulations. I see zero relevance to the subject of whether or not the OT is racist being a part of the problem. You water down a conversation to the easiest denominator, you're the problem. Go back and read the entirety of the post. I think BLM is a poorly run joke. But you will whittle it down to the talking point of whether or not the OT and MSB are largely racists. Literally look at the OPs post and count the upvotes/downvotes. Regardless of what you think they did wrong in that speech, they did much more RIGHT in that speech and again asked so very little of you or I in return. Yet F U ESPYs and NBA for subjecting us to that speech.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83686 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:14 am to
quote:

Setting up a straw man? Congratulations


:sigh:

quote:

But you will whittle it down to the talking point of whether or not the OT and MSB are largely racists


I will? You literally just did that

quote:

Literally look at the OPs post and count the upvotes/downvotes. Regardless of what you think they did wrong in that speech, they did much more RIGHT in that speech and again asked so very little of you or I in return. Yet F U ESPYs and NBA for subjecting us to that speech.


I think most got turned off in the beginning of the speech and did not listen to Wade's and Lebron's parts, which were the best parts

the beginning was not good though
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85483 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:42 am to
The misinformation and hyperbole on both sides is nauseating.

- The vast majority of interactions with LEOs are uneventful, but that doesn't excuse the times when things do go awry.
- The criminal background of a victim/perp has no bearing in whether or not their death is justifiable.
- By any measure out there, black people are no more likely to be killed by a police officer during an interaction than a white person or any other race.
- Framing the argument as if black parents are fearful for the safety of their children at the hands of the police is absurd when they're significantly more likely to be killed by someone in their neighborhood.
- Police officers aren't paid great and they have a dangerous job, but it doesn't excuse wrongdoing.
- Just because you can kill someone doesn't mean you should.
- There are no leaders in the "black community" because the black community doesn't exist. There are 38 million black people in this country and no one speaks for all of them or even a majority of them.
- On the same token, the majority of LEOs are good people too.

I could go on, but the crux of the argument is education with facts, not emotions. Stop believing every meme you see. Get off of social media, turn off the TV, and go out and interact with people in real life.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
8013 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

- The criminal background of a victim/perp has no bearing in whether or not their death is justifiable.

Agree with everything but this. While not the end all be all, history can be used if violence and assaults are prevalent. The same can be said about the officer. His arrest record and reported incidents are used to determine his culpability. If a victim/perp has a rap sheet longer than a receipt from Walgreen's and is full of violent offenses and weapon charges why can't that be used for clarity?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84023 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

most people just had a problem with them naming off Mike Brown, Sterling, Trayvon, etc in the beginning



Imo, the Trayvon incident is a distinguishable situation from the Tamir Rice, Gray, Brown, and Sterling incidents.

ETA: I know that is kind of off-topic, I just cringe whenever his name gets lumped into it.
This post was edited on 7/14/16 at 10:49 am
Posted by geauxtigahs87
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2008
26270 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:53 am to
My favorite quote was the "we need to end the shoot to kill mentality"

That pretty much sums up their mindset. The lives of murderous criminals are just as important, if not more so, than the safety of law enforcement officers. In other words, cops need to aim for the arm or leg in order to disarm them. Or maybe use a taser or pepper spray. And if all that doesn't work and the cop ends up dead, oh well.

I mean my God.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84023 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:57 am to
It's really stupid.

One person said that officers should not only learn to "de-escalate" situations, but not "escalate" situations in the first place? WTF? Do they not know why cops exist? Everyone knows I'm critical of police, but holy shite this mindset is just numbing. It's almost as if they are saying the police create criminals. NO. CRIMINALS MAKE CHOICES. The lack of personal responsibility and the refusal to address black culture in America in the BLM Movement is fallacious and very dangerous.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85483 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 10:57 am to
Well it is relevant if you're combating the narrative about the character of the victim, but it doesn't change anything about whether or not the shooting is justified. You'll often see people shrug off the shooting death of a felon, but we cannot let the societal value of that person overshadow the facts of whether or not a crime was committed.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85483 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:06 am to
Many of them are distinguishable, but when they get lumped together people completely disregard the entire message, and that is the problem that some people do not understand. This thread is a perfect example. If they don't list anyone, there is nothing to debate about their message. Instead, they rattle off high profile but completely different deaths and people completely miss the rest of their message.
Posted by AwesomeSauce
Das Boot
Member since May 2015
8013 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:09 am to
quote:

we cannot let the societal value of that person overshadow the facts of whether or not a crime was committed.

Not my argument. Character for both the cop and victim/perp in these situations is a part of the equation. Evidence can be circumstantial and character can be used to determine the probability of whether a crime was committed or not.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83686 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:10 am to
quote:

This thread is a perfect example. If they don't list anyone, there is nothing to debate about their message. Instead, they rattle off high profile but completely different deaths and people completely miss the rest of their message.


its a legit criticism though
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84023 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Many of them are distinguishable, but when they get lumped together people completely disregard the entire message, and that is the problem that some people do not understand.


The Martin incident lacks the important common denominator.

quote:

This thread is a perfect example. If they don't list anyone, there is nothing to debate about their message. Instead, they rattle off high profile but completely different deaths and people completely miss the rest of their message.



So people shouldn't criticize illogical arguments?
Posted by Fus0623
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2015
88972 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:21 am to
quote:

Why also not unite on stage with a white player as well?

There's no white guys in the Banana Boat Crew. Maybe they can induct Love?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85483 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:31 am to
quote:

its a legit criticism though


Yeah I agree and I should have been more clear. The names are unnecessary and overshadow the message. I wish they didn't include them, but I also get their overriding point. Unfortunately many others can't see past it.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
36819 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 11:40 am to
quote:


My god you guys get so butthurt over the most nonexistent of insults.


The Internet has ruined civil discussion. Everyone goes to their corners of the Internet and pokes fun at the crazies from the other side. So all you see is your own Circlejerk and extreme SJW OR extreme consertive.

I can't help but laugh when people on here talk about liberal victim mentality. No pretends to be victim like the liberal media bashing conservative
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

The Internet has ruined civil discussion. Everyone goes to their corners of the Internet and pokes fun at the crazies from the other side. So all you see is your own Circlejerk and extreme SJW OR extreme consertive.


I've heard Max Kellerman describe it like this.

It's like the movie Hollow Man, where the guy discovers invisibility and it corrupts him. That's what invisibility does, it divorces you from responsibility. The internet does the same thing to millions of people every day. People can anonymously log on to message boards and say whatever outlandish, irresponsible thing they want (things they would never say in real life in mixed company) because they essentially have invisibility. The internet pretty much turns people crazy.

If everyone had their real identities attached to their comments, well a lot of the BS would fall by the wayside.
This post was edited on 7/14/16 at 12:06 pm
Posted by 504Voodoo
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2012
13546 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 12:07 pm to
Well put.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15505 posts
Posted on 7/14/16 at 12:20 pm to
They included the names just to get peoples attention imo. That was the attention grabber hook. For many people, they paid more attention, but for many others as seen on this board, they paid even less attention.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram