Started By
Message

re: LNG, LNGLY, or LNGLF

Posted on 1/20/16 at 6:53 pm to
Posted by Jp1LSU
Fiji
Member since Oct 2005
2542 posts
Posted on 1/20/16 at 6:53 pm to
I either owned or currently own all three. I'm sincerely concerned that I'll never get my money back. I wouldn't touch any.
Posted by LSU0358
Member since Jan 2005
7920 posts
Posted on 1/21/16 at 8:34 am to
Liq Nat Gas was a good concept with $100 crude and $3 natural gas. With $30 crude and $2 natural gas the margins just aren't there. Countries that where going to import nat gas and use it as fuel (for power plants etc) now just use crude or crude derivatives.
This post was edited on 1/21/16 at 9:19 am
Posted by Jp1LSU
Fiji
Member since Oct 2005
2542 posts
Posted on 4/19/16 at 7:57 am to
There was a bit of a pop in these names yesterday. Was there a company specific reason? Anyone have any idea why?
Posted by cjared036
Houston, tx
Member since Dec 2009
9569 posts
Posted on 4/19/16 at 8:16 am to
me dos. hopefully we enter an epic winter and these companies get some momentum...

so that the price can go up and I can get my money back.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram