Started By
Message

Spinoff- Opinions on Toyota Tundra/Tacoma

Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:12 am
Posted by I APOLLO I
atx
Member since Jun 2014
330 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:12 am
What is the overall opinion of trucks from Toyota?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83953 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:13 am to
I have one and I think their quality is overrated.
Posted by DaTroof
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2015
978 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:13 am to
They're well worth the money and are more "American Made" than Ford or Chevy.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84304 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:13 am to
They're good, especially the Taco. But the Tundra is nothing special.
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
19196 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:15 am to
I've had an '82 4x4 pickup, a 2000 4x4 Tacoma and a 2000 4x4 Tundra. I've never had to do anything other than standard service to any of them. They are freaking indestructible.

Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
66364 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:16 am to
my tundra is about to hit 100k miles. only things i've changed on it are oil,brakes,tires and windshields.
Posted by meeple
Carcassonne
Member since May 2011
9412 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:20 am to
I haven't seen the base 2016 model so this is a comparison of the current generation. It doesn't seem like a midsize truck, it's more of a compact truck in disguise.

I get the visual appeal. It seems to me that they just appear bigger because of the wide fender molding and larger tires. The trucks are even jacked up higher to appear bigger so they have to add the mud flaps to close that gap between the ground and truck for the illusion that it's a bigger truck. Especially since it's marketed as such, with the "Prerunner" package to make a 2x4 truck look like a 4x4.

It's clearly obvious when I see a base model without all of the body side molding, large tires and mud flaps. Then compare that to the one that is commonly seen about. They're the same truck, it's just made to look bigger.

Base Tacoma:





Most commonly seen Prerunner 4x2 or 4x4 Tacoma:



Tacoma:
Head Room: 40.0"
Hip Room: 53.6"
Leg Room: 41.7"
Shoulder Room: 57.7"

Ranger:
Head Room: 39.2"
Hip Room: 52.7"
Leg Room: 42.4"
Shoulder Room: 54.5"
This post was edited on 11/5/15 at 8:21 am
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
39062 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:22 am to
They're OK, but tons of dorks out there bolt all sorts shite on them and suddenly think they're expedition vehicles. Just makes them ugly IMO.
Posted by AnonymousTiger
Franklin, TN
Member since Jan 2012
4863 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:26 am to
I still drive my 26 year old Toyota everyday. Never had to do anything to the engine except routine maintenance and change out the starter.
Posted by Homey the Clown
Member since Feb 2009
5720 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:27 am to
Im a fan of Toyota in general. Last vehicle was a Camry. Traded it in for a Tundra. Never a problem with either.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28317 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 8:57 am to
Good trucks, but quality (relative to Toyota's overall reputation) is about the same as Ford and GM.

A bit behind on electronics and user interfaces. Somewhat poorer MPG than Ford and GM.

Outstanding resale value, especially on Tacoma.
Posted by Croacka
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2008
61441 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:00 am to
People think that because the 20 year old ones are still on the road that the current models will achieve the same long term quality and dependability


And they pay handsomely for that assumption
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166500 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:01 am to
quote:

Toyota Tundra/


gas guzzler
ugly
quality highly overrated
feels very cheap
won't get your ecred very far at hunting camp
Posted by skinny domino
sebr
Member since Feb 2007
14350 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:26 am to
quote:

What is the overall opinion of trucks from Toyota?
on my 3rd Tundra - 245,000 on my 2001 - no problems, 175,000 on my 2006 no problems and now have 30,000 on my 2014 crewcab 4/4 - no problems - except the 2014 with the big engine gets around 16 mpg - it is whatever you like - Ford and Chevy makes good trucks also - Dodge not so much - going by the vehicles we had down in Argentina 4/4's they didn't hold up too well.
Posted by putt1058
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2008
842 posts
Posted on 11/5/15 at 9:32 am to
I wanted to buy a Tacoma, but they are "bare bones" trucks. Nice, but not very many bells and whistles. To get one with more stuff, you have to pay through the schnozola PLUS there was only ONE "Limited" in a 5 state area....think they would discount it? NOT.

I ended up with a CPO 4Runner instead and couldn't be more pleased with it.

Once again, my "overall opinion.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram