- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:17 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
Doesn't matter
Yep. And, had sex.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:18 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Overall, the report says, all-male teams and crews outperformed mixed-gender ones on 93 out of 134 tasks evaluated. All-male teams were universally faster “in each tactical movement.”
I'm actually surprised that the ratio was this low.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:18 pm to athenslife101
quote:
What I would also like for a fully authentic study is to see is the results of female only tests. I would think those would be higher than the gender mixed as well honestly.
Well the women were less accurate...
quote:
All-male 0311 (rifleman) infantry squads had better accuracy compared to gender-integrated squads. There was a notable difference between genders for every individual weapons system (i.e. M4, M27, and M203) within the 0311 squads, except for the probability of hit & near miss with the M4.
And more prone to injury...
quote:
The report also says that female Marines had higher rates of injury throughout the experiment.
So I'd say trying to create all female infantry squads would only make things even worse.
This post was edited on 9/10/15 at 4:19 pm
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:19 pm to Fun Bunch
What about the gays
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:19 pm to Fun Bunch
Are you being sarcastic?
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:20 pm to GeauxColonels
There were several sandwich making and bitching/complaining/moaning tasks assessed.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:21 pm to biglego
quote:
by biglego
What about the navy
Good question. What about them?
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:22 pm to LucasP
quote:
Good question. What about them?
The Navy is all women already, isn't it?
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:23 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
Overall, the report says, all-male teams and crews outperformed mixed-gender ones on 93 out of 134 tasks evaluated. All-male teams were universally faster “in each tactical movement.”
Forward!!!!
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:23 pm to Fun Bunch
this is so sexist that it's probably racist too
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:23 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
This country is becoming weaker faster than anyone ever anticipated.
Thanks liberals.
Thanks liberals.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:24 pm to GeauxColonels
quote:
I'm actually surprised that the ratio was this low.
If you read the article, there were several exercises that gave the Mixed Gender teams a distinct advantage: Rescue exercises where the women were basically casualties and had to be carried out of there, for instance. The women were signficantly lighter for the men to carry, therefore the squad did better.
Which is pretty damn stupid.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:24 pm to Five0
Eh, it depends on what the training is but but I've seen other sorts of training with mixed units and they've found that women with women perform better and men and men togeather perform better than men and women.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:25 pm to Fun Bunch
An all-female squad would perform about as well as my son's 3rd grade class.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:26 pm to athenslife101
quote:
Eh, it depends on what the training is but but I've seen other sorts of training with mixed units and they've found that women with women perform better and men and men togeather perform better than men and women.
Fine. Let them be in combat support units and leave combat arms alone.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:26 pm to Darth_Vader
Honestly that is likely but that's why you have to test it.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:26 pm to athenslife101
quote:
Eh, it depends on what the training is but but I've seen other sorts of training with mixed units and they've found that women with women perform better and men and men togeather perform better than men and women.
Women are better tank shields.
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:28 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:So, what you are saying is, it is actually advantageous to have women in combat units because it will be easier to carry them when they get wounded?
If you read the article, there were several exercises that gave the Mixed Gender teams a distinct advantage: Rescue exercises where the women were basically casualties and had to be carried out of there, for instance. The women were signficantly lighter for the men to carry, therefore the squad did better.
Well, that supports having female troopers.
Sign 'em up for the draft!
Posted on 9/10/15 at 4:29 pm to athenslife101
There's no reason for women to be in the military at all. They do nothing but spread disease and lower discipline. They are an inefficient source of labor.
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News