- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:33 am to monsterballads
quote:where in the article is the government persecuting these people?
because frick the 1st amendment, right?
And if you're so pro first amendment then don't you support the rights of the bikers and veterans go express their opinions just the same ?
This is actually exactly how this should work.
No government involvement, two groups of people free to speak their ideals in a common place.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:34 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
It's the whole "SJW" PC bullshite that goes with it
the CJW (Conservative Justice Warriors) are just as annoying as the SJWs
just FYI
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:34 am to swamplynx
quote:
Did I miss the part of history class when the US systematically killed people on a large scale
Yes. You did.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:37 am to monsterballads
quote:
they absolutely do. that doesn't involve assaulting people.
Link to assults?
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:38 am to Dandy Lion
quote:
So the classic definition of ´biker´, AKA Hell´s Angels, is not what we´re talking about, correct?
I'm not 100% sure what all MC's were involved in this protest. But I did see a picture in another link where some of the bikers were wearing the golden hammer that signifies at least support for the HA's.
He is wearing a Sgt-At-Arms patch but I can't make out the club name. It's something "Sons". He and the other bikers behind him look to have some red & white patches so I'd guess this is a HA support club.
This post was edited on 7/2/15 at 10:40 am
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:40 am to Silverback
quote:
it does not protect against receiving a beat-down
but that DOES show the complete hypocrisy of the bikers. they bitch about "free speech" but god forbid anyone say something they disagree with. so silly.
they don't even realize that they've helped the SJW's cause 100 fold.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:42 am to monsterballads
quote:You can't expect bikers to look at the bigger pictures.
they don't even realize that they've helped the SJW's cause 100 fold.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:42 am to Darth_Vader
sounds like a whole bunch of dumbasses in one place at same time
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:44 am to TheCaterpillar
I am a little confused. The SJW's said their mission was to burn the flag to gripe about police brutality. Halfway through it changed to combatting racism and genocide, then changed to bitching because the counter protestors refused to become SJW's.
It is clear that they are unclear about what they want. Their total ineptitude in defining any point turned their little protest into a WTF moment.
At least they got a little needed cardio when they were tucking tail and running from the counter protestors. Keyboard bitching provides no cardio benefit.
It is clear that they are unclear about what they want. Their total ineptitude in defining any point turned their little protest into a WTF moment.
At least they got a little needed cardio when they were tucking tail and running from the counter protestors. Keyboard bitching provides no cardio benefit.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:45 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
It's not just the flag burning. It's the whole "SJW" PC bullshite that goes with it.
The SJWs get their strength from the attention they receive when they make some outlandish statement, which results in a somewhat over the top response from the other side, which then generates more attention and more media coverage.
If more people just ignored some of the SJW articles and blog postings they wouldn't get nearly as much traction. However when one blogger post something and then gets huge response from the other side, you just allowed one person to bring tons of attention to the issue that otherwise would have gone unnoticed.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:46 am to Hangit
quote:
It is clear that they are unclear about what they want. Their total ineptitude in defining any point turned their little protest into a WTF moment
Sounds like the #occupywallstreet folks
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:46 am to GreatLakesTiger24
If find it amazing how many here think that just ignoring these "SJW" idiots will make them go away.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:50 am to Darth_Vader
Ignoring them is far more likely to make them go away than a bunch of fruitcakes dressed in leather trying to intimidate them.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:50 am to monsterballads
quote:
because frick the 1st amendment, right?
1st Amendment protects you from the government, not from your fellow citizens, as the SJWs pushing gay marriage have very effectively taught everyone.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:52 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
If find it amazing how many here think that just ignoring these "SJW" idiots will make them go away.
which do you think is a better tactic?
giving them more attention and aggressively trying to shut them up?
or ignoring them?
when has the first tactic EVER worked?
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:52 am to upgrayedd
quote:
What in the high frick is an anti-police activist?
The same people that will piss, moan, and sue the city when the police don't show up to prevent them from getting their asses kicked by a bunch of bikers.
upgraye double D.
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:52 am to Darth_Vader
Hallowed Sons
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:53 am to monsterballads
quote:
my point is the hypocrisy of people who only support free speech when they agree with it.
Then don't use the 1st Amendment in your argument unless it's some government functionary or group trying to silence private citizens.
Private citizens trying to silence each other is a vastly different creature than a government trying to silence private citizens. Trying to use the First Amendment to make your case shows only that you don't really understand the First Amendment and thus takes away far more from your argument than it could ever add to it (except to those likewise ignorant of the extent of the First Amendment).
Posted on 7/2/15 at 10:53 am to Salmon
quote:
which do you think is a better tactic?
giving them more attention and aggressively trying to shut them up?
or ignoring them?
Well the second tactic has been tried for going on 50 years and it's not worked worth a shite.
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News