Started By
Message

Which Beatle had the best solo music?

Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:56 am
Posted by TheIndulger
Member since Sep 2011
19239 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:56 am
After the band split up, which Beatle had the best solo music?

My vote goes to George. All Things Must Pass is one of the greatest albums of all time. John's music was good too, and Imagine is 10/10 awesome. I thought Paul was better with the band than without-his solo music seemed to lack a strong depth. And admittedly I haven't listened to a ton of Ringo.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
81741 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:07 am to
Overall: Paul
Best single: Ringo/George
Posted by Poodlebrain
Way Right of Rex
Member since Jan 2004
19860 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:14 pm to
They all have produced memorable music post-Beatles. But Paul probably wins due to volume of output. It has not been consistently good, but there is enough that is good though to claim the prize.
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45162 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 12:32 pm to
Paul but George had the GOAT post Beatles album
Posted by Larry
Collierville, TN
Member since Jul 2004
5454 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 2:42 pm to
George. There is just no getting past the absolute shitshow McCartney put on in the 80s
Posted by S
RIP Wayde
Member since Jan 2007
155929 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 4:18 pm to
paul
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22928 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 7:26 pm to
Overall IMO: Paul

Best Album: George by a long shot, again, in my humble opinion.
Posted by IonaTiger
The Commonwealth Of Virginia
Member since Mar 2006
33053 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 10:26 pm to
John (minus Yoko)
George
Paul
Ringo
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 10:27 pm
Posted by The Boat
Member since Oct 2008
164352 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:29 pm to
Paul then George

The John and Yoko collaboration is the bane of my existence. Most is absolute shite.
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
7825 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:42 pm to
mccartney
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40754 posts
Posted on 6/26/15 at 11:42 pm to
For my personal tastes:
George
Ringo's cheesy tunes like Photograph
John
Paul

As a more unbiased critic:

Paul
John/George







Ringo
This post was edited on 6/26/15 at 11:43 pm
Posted by Douglas Green
Atlanta, Ga.
Member since Oct 2014
665 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 12:51 am to
I always think of how good the next Beatle record would have been if they had stayed together. Think of the solo hits being on it.
Posted by 225bred
COYS
Member since Jun 2011
20386 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 10:20 am to
George
Posted by Marciano1
Marksville, LA
Member since Jun 2009
18471 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:05 am to
quote:

My vote goes to George. All Things Must Pass is one of the greatest albums of all time. John's music was good too, and Imagine is 10/10 awesome. I thought Paul was better with the band than without-his solo music seemed to lack a strong depth. And admittedly I haven't listened to a ton of Ringo.

This

There are several songs on All Things Must Pass that were rejected by John and Paul to include on Beatles albums. It's on par with some of the Beatles' very best.
This post was edited on 6/27/15 at 11:07 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89622 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:14 am to
Their solo careers reflected their influence and style within the band:

Paul - most prolific, most catchy - best pop sensibilities

John - most biting, most political, most densely packed lyrical content

George - most thoughtful, most introspective, most spiritual

Ringo - most fun, most upbeat, most positive (although this is close with Paul's solo work)

And they clearly influenced each other to a certain degree - take "Watching the Wheels" and "Woman" - by John, as 2 examples - although clearly John, those songs have a very George vibe to them. George's "Got my mind set on you" - sounds almost like John singing a song written by Paul, from a pure stylistic standpoint.

Ringo's huge hit "Photograph" was co-written with George, so that's an obvious influence there.

So - this is very subjective - and if you liked Paul's songs with the Beatles, you're probably going to prefer his solo work and so on.

Heck, is "Photograph" the best single by a solo Beatle? Maybe. And it is by the least valuable from a musical standpoint and clearly the worst singer.

Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51493 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 11:25 am to
Paul. Not even close.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
65147 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 1:29 pm to
From a critical standpoint I would say John Lennon. His Imagine is regarded as one of the greatest songs of all-time. Paul McCartney had more hits though.
Posted by BowlJackson
Birmingham, AL
Member since Sep 2013
52881 posts
Posted on 6/27/15 at 4:49 pm to
George Harrison was the only Beatle worth a shite.


The real Paul McCartney died around 1967 so the guy releasing music under his name doesn't actually count as a "solo" Beatle, although he's had some solid stuff. (Still not as good as George anyway)
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram