Started By
Message

Am I the only one who likes neutral site games

Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:03 pm
Posted by JEAUXBLEAUX
Bayonne, NJ
Member since May 2006
55358 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:03 pm
Good national publicity against good teams. No I live too far to go back to Baton Rouge before you ask
Posted by LSUrme
CTC
Member since Oct 2005
5335 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:05 pm to
Yes, now GTFO.
Posted by tigerbait1.6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2013
3822 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:08 pm to
I bet you want to play thanksgiving night is tiger stadium as well...
Posted by catholictigerfan
Member since Oct 2009
56103 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:12 pm to
which sport? I'm guessing football, I rather home home series rather than neutral site. Kinda like we did with West Virginia instead of one game vs Oregon. But I'm fine with it if we have to play them.

In other sports neutral site games are great because usually they are a part of round robin tournaments and usually you play better teams than if you play teams at home.
Posted by diehardtiger68
Gateway to the Marsh
Member since Feb 2009
576 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:12 pm to
Yup
Posted by Fight4LSU
Kenner
Member since Jul 2005
9761 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:13 pm to
I don't mind every couple years. Oregon game in Dallas was fun. I think It should have been a true home/home with Wisconsin though.
Posted by saint amant steve
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2008
5695 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:22 pm to
quote:

Good national publicity against good teams.


This argument really gets to me. The whole notion of selling the LSU "brand" makes college football overly commercialized, which it sadly is these days given television contracts and athletic apparel sponsorship.

There is a reason why I prefer collegiate over professional football. I enjoy the on-campus atmosphere and the accompanying passion and pageantry.

When you schedule more and more games at these professional venues it only furthers the idea that college football is nothing more than a farm league for the NFL.

Some people are fine with that but I personally am not.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79867 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Good national publicity against good teams.


Just as easy to get that in Tiger Stadium. I would think the exposure would actually be better for potential recruits watching on national TV.
Posted by LoveThatMoney
Who knows where?
Member since Jan 2008
12268 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:26 pm to
I like them, personally, but I can see people being pissed if they are season ticket holders. They have one less game to watch live now (or, perhaps more accurately, one less game they can sell their tickets to).
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:32 pm to
I love them. BR is a heater at that point anyways. Love traveling to a big city with Monday off
Posted by LSUTygerFan
Homerun Village
Member since Jun 2008
33232 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:33 pm to
i don't like losing a home game for a neutral site game.
Posted by spiderman
Member since Jan 2004
1176 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Am I the only one who likes neutral site games
Most Non-season ticket holders like them. After all, you are watching from your couch so what does it matter to you where the game is played.

Most season ticket holders hate them b/c it robs us of getting great non-conference home games in Tiger Stadium.
Posted by SFVtiger
Member since Oct 2003
4286 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 3:57 pm to
I like them. or don't object is probably more accurate. the competition early in the year is better than a home game that time of the year, usually. national TV is assured, usually a very good time slot. that early in the season it's nice to have an inside game, too. I know it usually deprives us of a home game but all in all, I'm ok w/ it.

so if I had to pick between McNeese on labor day weekend in TS or, for instance, Okla St in Atlanta, I'd take the latter.
Posted by p0845330
Member since Aug 2013
5704 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 4:09 pm to
I will watch the game regardless of where it is played, but I prefer home and home to a neutral site game.

If it is a big game, it will still be on TV, and the exposure will still be there. For those attending, the atmosphere of a game on campus is a far better prospect.

I am not a season ticket holder, and am certainly not an expert on the financial ins and outs of neutral site vs. home and home. It just seems to me that much is being missed out on when holding a neutral site game.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
9362 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 6:00 pm to
Neutral sites are like parasites that leech some of the essence of college football away from the sport. It's part of the evolution of the business side of the sport and,like many others, I hate it.

The entire purpose of having your own stadium with an AURA, is so you can showcase it on national television to fans and recruits. Its one of the ways you build a persona for the program. If no one wants to play at home stadiums they should just save money, tear them down and go to "rentastadium.com" to schedule the next neutral site match up.

UGA and Notre Dame are doing a home and away and I am glad they are not doing a pussy neutral site.
This post was edited on 5/19/15 at 6:09 pm
Posted by austintexastiger
Austin, Texas
Member since Aug 2006
1915 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 6:28 pm to
I love playing in Dallas and Houston since i live in Austin and have season tickets
Posted by geauxpurple
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2014
12472 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 9:13 pm to
I like them. It makes for an exciting opening week and we always get a nice vacation out of it. It helps that we have won them all so far.
Posted by StatMaster
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2005
4292 posts
Posted on 5/19/15 at 10:02 pm to
I'd rather play a really good team at a neutral site than play a mediocre or bad team at home. That being said, if we can do a home and home with a really good team, I'm for that option over anything. However, those games are the most difficult to schedule.
Posted by N.O. via West-Cal
New Orleans
Member since Aug 2004
7179 posts
Posted on 5/20/15 at 8:45 am to
I used to be for them but then I realized what their net impact is: a significant reduction in good OOC games being played on college campuses.

In a vacuum I have no problem with, say, LSU playing Wisconsin in Houston. That's a good, appealing matchup. But I would prefer for that game to be played in TS (or Camp Randall), and the proliferation of neutral site games makes good OOC games less likely to be played on campus. Indeed a normal SEC schedule has only lousy OOC games being played on campus. So, for me, I am against the neutral site games because I see them as a net negative, not because the games themselves are bad.
Posted by LSUsuperfresh
Member since Oct 2010
8336 posts
Posted on 5/20/15 at 9:09 am to
I don't mind them. I had a lot of fun in Houston last year sans the after the game debacle.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram