- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Equality: When Feminism Logic Goes Wrong
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:21 am
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:21 am
Warning: This is a fairly long post so please bear with me.
I was talking with my girlfriend yesterday and I brought up the recent expansion among the Power 5 conferences in Division I to provide full scholarship coverage to their student-athletes.
I remarked that the system would ultimately fail for most institutions because of the lack of revenue generated by sports outside the big three (football, basketball, and baseball) and in particularly women's athletics.
She then states that society should abolish the gender classification in sports and athletics anyway. I reply, "Well then women will never be able to participate in sports."
She retorts, "Why not?", to which I say "Because men are genetically superior in terms of athletic potential."
She proceeds to tell me that the only reason that men are "superior" is because of intended breeding over the history of civilization. She directly alluded to the intentional decision to not value strength (literal) in women and therefore to not place a high priority in mating with strong women.
I politely pointed out that I disagreed with her assertion (although I really thought it was absolute bullshite).
I said, "Baby, women are incapable of achieving the maximum athletic potential of males because of genetic composition and the lack of certain hormones which directly impact muscle growth, aggression, and performance."
The straw that broke the camel's back was her argument that society once thought that black people weren't equals and look how that turned out...
Keep in mind, she is graduating from the Honor's College with two degrees, two minors, and is enrolling in LSU Law this fall. She is not an idiot by any means.
With that being said, how can someone be so dense?
I was talking with my girlfriend yesterday and I brought up the recent expansion among the Power 5 conferences in Division I to provide full scholarship coverage to their student-athletes.
I remarked that the system would ultimately fail for most institutions because of the lack of revenue generated by sports outside the big three (football, basketball, and baseball) and in particularly women's athletics.
She then states that society should abolish the gender classification in sports and athletics anyway. I reply, "Well then women will never be able to participate in sports."
She retorts, "Why not?", to which I say "Because men are genetically superior in terms of athletic potential."
She proceeds to tell me that the only reason that men are "superior" is because of intended breeding over the history of civilization. She directly alluded to the intentional decision to not value strength (literal) in women and therefore to not place a high priority in mating with strong women.
I politely pointed out that I disagreed with her assertion (although I really thought it was absolute bullshite).
I said, "Baby, women are incapable of achieving the maximum athletic potential of males because of genetic composition and the lack of certain hormones which directly impact muscle growth, aggression, and performance."
The straw that broke the camel's back was her argument that society once thought that black people weren't equals and look how that turned out...
Keep in mind, she is graduating from the Honor's College with two degrees, two minors, and is enrolling in LSU Law this fall. She is not an idiot by any means.
With that being said, how can someone be so dense?
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:23 am to saint amant steve
quote:
She is not an idiot by any means.
You sure about that, chief?
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:23 am to saint amant steve
quote:
how can someone be so dense?
emotional thinking, which often leads to irrational thinking
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:24 am to saint amant steve
Lack of sexual satisfaction
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:24 am to saint amant steve
Good job you have a feminist!!! Is she also a SJW?
I bet she doesn't even suck your dick or make sandwiches
I bet she doesn't even suck your dick or make sandwiches
This post was edited on 4/16/15 at 10:25 am
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:24 am to saint amant steve
Dude....my g/f is a physician and we have very similar conversations. Book smarts has nothing to do with it.
There have been many arguments where she will admit the facts aren't in her favor. Her response? "Well, that's just how I feel."
There have been many arguments where she will admit the facts aren't in her favor. Her response? "Well, that's just how I feel."
This post was edited on 4/16/15 at 10:26 am
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:25 am to saint amant steve
quote:
she is graduating from the Honor's College with two degrees, two minors, and is enrolling in LSU Law this fall.
So essentially, she's wasting her education? Has she ever thought that just maybe the law field is oversaturated and has been for over 15 years now?
quote:
With that being said, how can someone be so dense?
Logic is the key word here. Women's actions and thoughts are emotionally driven, not logically driven.
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:25 am to saint amant steve
quote:
I was talking with my ex-girlfriend yesterday
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:25 am to saint amant steve
that's not feminism, it's just stupidity. I don't even think a rational feminist would seriously make that argument.
This post was edited on 4/16/15 at 10:27 am
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:26 am to saint amant steve
quote:
Keep in mind, she is graduating from the Honor's College with two degrees, two minors, and is enrolling in LSU Law this fall. She is not an idiot by any means
That has nothing to do with common sense or reason. She sounds like a perfect product of the bullshite liberalist thinking that passes for education in this country today.
I bet she's voting for Hilldawg isn't she?
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:27 am to saint amant steve
quote:
women
There is your answer....
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:27 am to saint amant steve
quote:
She proceeds to tell me that the only reason that men are "superior" is because of intended breeding over the history of civilization
quote:
She is not an idiot by any means
I beg to differ. That breeding statement makes absolutely no sense.
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:28 am to saint amant steve
No she's definitely an idiot.
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:28 am to saint amant steve
She just needs more penis
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:28 am to saint amant steve
I'd lose her. Seriously.
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:32 am to saint amant steve
Time to cut bait on that one bro.
The last thing you want is to get stuck with an idiot SJW for the rest of your life.
The last thing you want is to get stuck with an idiot SJW for the rest of your life.
This post was edited on 4/16/15 at 10:34 am
Posted on 4/16/15 at 10:32 am to saint amant steve
Your girlfriend sounds unattractive. Sorry about that.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News