- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:59 pm to wope
I think I'll hold off on believing this until a reliable source reports it.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:59 pm to THRILLHO
quote:
I really think that he'd fetch more than that given his cheap cost over the next two seasons
but you'd have to have a bidding war for him from a few teams, and i just don't see that kind of value. they can just invest in a WR with that draft pick if it gets higher than a 5th
Posted on 3/12/15 at 12:59 pm to WB504
quote:
Wonder if he was part of the problem in the locker room
Who knows, but would be surprising. Doesn't seem like the type.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:00 pm to THRILLHO
this made me think about how terrible our local media coverage is...whens the last time they've broken any news? how does a TV anchor in Washington DC have better sources than people who cover the team on a daily basis?
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:00 pm to Brageous
It would have to be for a high return. 2nd or 3rd round. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense. And I doubt they can find a team stupid enough to give that for Stills at this point. shite...Marshall went to NYJ for a 5th.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:00 pm to Brageous
Might be part of a big picture trade...I mean what does redskins have that we can use?
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
does anybody honestly expect better than a 4th for him? i mean best case scenario
a 5th or 6th is more likely
No but if you're not going to get much back for him and he's cheap, you're thin at WR, and he's not a locker room problem(as far as we now) why are we considering this?
This post was edited on 3/12/15 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:01 pm to saintsfan22
even if he is a cancer, he'd have to be a HUGE arse cancer to override the cost/production matrix
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:02 pm to Indfanfromcol
What in the actual frick
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:06 pm to Lester Earl
Mickey Loomis is great GM they said.
Our offense is plug and play they said.
Our offense is plug and play they said.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they can just invest in a WR with that draft pick if it gets higher than a 5th
The odds of getting someone as good as Stills in the 3rd or 4th round are pretty low.
A good suggestion I've read would be NE (whom we've traded with in the past at least once). They suck at drafting WR's and need a deeep threat.
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:06 pm to BayouRat15
I don't think that NFL Access is verified
Posted on 3/12/15 at 1:07 pm to Lester Earl
Wow Loomis doesn't want Drew to have anyone to throw to
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News