Started By
Message

re: SpaceX Launch Today

Posted on 2/8/15 at 3:29 pm to
Posted by BottomlandBrew
Member since Aug 2010
27155 posts
Posted on 2/8/15 at 3:29 pm to
I think they filled this one up with a little more landing fuel. They said last time they were a little naive on how much fuel it would burn coming down.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39607 posts
Posted on 2/8/15 at 3:57 pm to
quote:

I think they filled this one up with a little more landing fuel. They said last time they were a little naive on how much fuel it would burn coming down.



I'm no rocket scientist, but my mind can't get around why you just wouldn't put more fuel in it to begin with. They were testing if they could land the thing, not how efficiently they could do it. I would think you'd lean towards more fuel than less, then do the calculations from there.

Maybe I'm missing something though.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
22261 posts
Posted on 2/10/15 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

I think they filled this one up with a little more landing fuel.

Well I don't see how this could possibly be a bad thing.
Posted by The Mick
Member since Oct 2010
43222 posts
Posted on 2/11/15 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

I think they filled this one up with a little more landing fuel. They said last time they were a little naive on how much fuel it would burn coming down.
How can you have the technology/engineering to build something like this but you cant calculate fuel consumption properly?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram