Started By
Message

re: WBRZ at 10, land behind the levee debate

Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:50 pm to
Posted by ruzil
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2012
16948 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:50 pm to
My dad used to own 20 acre of land on the east bank of St Charles Parish. While he didn't have mineral rights, he did have batture rights and owned the land right up to the middle ot the river. He had a long term lease with a barge company to rent his batture. Didn't bring in too much dollars though.

The land was divided way, way before there were levees and the USCoE only took land needed for the levees.
Posted by mack the knife
EBR
Member since Oct 2012
4186 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 9:58 pm to
USACE doesnt "own" the land the levee sits on (usually). they have servitude on a private piece of property.
Posted by dawg23
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jul 2011
5065 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:52 pm to
quote:

My dad used to own 20 acre of land on the east bank of St Charles Parish. While he didn't have mineral rights, he did have batture rights and owned the land right up to the middle ot the river.
Uh, sorry to be the one to mention this, but if you're referring to the Mississippi River, he doesn't own to the middle.

He may own to the "ordinary (mean) low water line." The State of Louisiana owns the bed of the Mississippi River (and the bed of all other rivers that were deemed navigable in 1812) from mean low water line to mean low water line.
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 2/3/15 at 12:53 pm to
I assure you that you do not own any part of the Mississippi River
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram