- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: AT&T Vs Cox Highspeed internet
Posted on 1/7/15 at 11:11 am to Jimbeaux28
Posted on 1/7/15 at 11:11 am to Jimbeaux28
quote:
AT&T internet with Uverse is basically DSL quality.
I don't understand why some people willingly pay for something they don't get. I had one problem when I was with Uverse and I stayed on their arse until it was fixed. With the exception of one week out of 2-3 years I always had the speed I paid for.
ETA:
Either way Cox offers the better deal on internet.
This post was edited on 1/7/15 at 11:27 am
1
Posted on 1/7/15 at 11:29 am to junkfunky
Yeah, when I was with U-verse for over 2 years, I had an outage of approximately 2 hours, and 100% up time outside of that. I always got my advertised speed. By comparison, Cox has more maintenance-related outages, but they are short, infrequent, and usually only during hours where normal humans shouldn't be awake and on the internet anyway. Haven't had a Cox outage in months, actually, not even for a minute. So, I rarely have to compare ISPs based on reliability. Simply, I am paying 20% more for 5x the bandwidth with lower latency.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News