quote:
This concerns me as well, and it's just not fricking right. Indict if you believe in the merits of the crime, not for this reason. It's bullshite to put Wilson, or any man through a trial for that reason if you don't find merit in this phase. It's not what the court is for, or how it is meant to function.

When you guys were positive it was not going to be an indictment, it was long lectures for the "rioters" about how things work. Now that you think you might not get things to go your way, the court is the all screwed up and you are still right.

3 ...

Report Post

Posted by TT9

Global warming

Member since Sep 2008

82952 posts

Posted on 11/24/14 at 2:59 pm to Big Scrub TX

The officer was innocent from day one on this board.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by mmcgrath

Indianapolis

Member since Feb 2010

35475 posts

Posted on 11/24/14 at 2:59 pm to Big Scrub TX

quote:
When you guys were positive it was not going to be an indictment, it was long lectures for the "rioters" about how things work. Now that you think you might not get things to go your way, the court is the all screwed up and you are still right.

Maybe they should have delayed the verdict so that the "free Wilson" people would have forgotten about it.

0 ...

Report Post

Posted by NHTIGER

Central New Hampshire

Member since Nov 2003

16188 posts

Posted on 11/24/14 at 3:05 pm to Big Scrub TX

quote:
When you guys were positive it was not going to be an indictment, it was long lectures for the "rioters" about how things work. Now that you think you might not get things to go your way, the court is the all screwed up and you are still right.

For the record, since he was responding to my post, I have never said on this Board, or any other forum, that I thought the GJ would return no true bill.

Never.

This post was edited on 11/24/14 at 3:07 pm

2 ...

Report Post

Political Talk - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board