- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Loss of Antarctic ice has caused a measurable shift in gravity
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:37 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:37 am to Jim Rockford
Where's the study on the massive amount of dollar printing, shifting weight from forests to DC, causing an increase in methane production from over-eating politicians? Huh?!
Global warming!
Just a theory I have.
Global warming!
Just a theory I have.
1
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:39 am to ballscaster
quote:
When polar ice melts, the water shifts toward the equator, due to the earth's rotation, in a way that the ice obviously couldn't because it is static.
That would be the I'd the oceans didn't have convection. Actually the difference in weight you commie scum is due to the plastic asthenosphere
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:39 am to ballscaster
quote:
When polar ice melts, the water shifts toward the equator, due to the earth's rotation, in a way that the ice obviously couldn't because it is static.
That would be the I'd the oceans didn't have convection. Actually the difference in weight you commie scum is due to the plastic asthenosphere
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:41 am to BestBanker
quote:
Where's the study on the massive amount of dollar printing, shifting weight from forests to DC, causing an increase in methane production from over-eating politicians? Huh?!
Global warming!
Just a theory I have.
I'll help you. I think we need a $50mil grant to study it.
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:46 am to ironsides
quote:
May as well have just said "this is an advertisement for more climate research grants".
That's ultimately always the answer isn't it? The scientists must be wrong ...because ... they get paid for their work.
That's an argument too stupid to even argue with.
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:48 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
and sea rise could be as much as 50 inches by the end of the century.
over 4 more feet of flood water is no big deal!
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 7:49 am
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:49 am to SpidermanTUba
TUba
Just admit that Global warming is 100 % Complete and utter bullshite, and let's move on.
Just admit that Global warming is 100 % Complete and utter bullshite, and let's move on.
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:50 am to CptBengal
quote:
That would be the I'd the oceans didn't have convection
So convection means the effects of a rotating frame can be ignored? That's interesting.
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:50 am to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Just admit that Global warming is 100 % Complete and utter bullshite, and let's move on.
It must be. The scientists are paid!
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:51 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
and 2.5 more feet of flood water is no big deal!
50 Inches =/= 2.5 feet
Phoney scientist
ETA: TUba edited,but not before I busted him with this gem.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 7:56 am
Posted on 10/1/14 at 7:52 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:Au contraire, it's a HUGE DEAL! HUGE . . . if you believe it.
over 4 more feet of flood water is no big deal!
Like I said, we'd better get our azolla agriculture dusted off so we can fix this. Apparently you missed the reference.
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:35 am to ballscaster
quote:
When polar ice melts, the water shifts toward the equator, due to the earth's rotation, in a way that the ice obviously couldn't because it is static. This causes an increase in the difference between one's weight at the equator and at a pole, which is measurable
See, Southerners aren't obese compared to the Northerners. We just live closer to the equator. It's not our fault
Posted on 10/1/14 at 8:37 am to Jim Rockford
Wonder what gravity was like during the ice ages? Must have been hard as well to walk around.
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:16 am to deltaland
But you weigh less at the equator than at a pole. 
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:16 am to ballscaster
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:41 am to Jim Rockford
We could solve the Obesity Problem if we are able to reduce the force of Gravity.
Reduce Gravity and Obese Americans instantly weigh less. An incredible breakthrough !
Reduce Gravity and Obese Americans instantly weigh less. An incredible breakthrough !
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:49 am to CptBengal
quote:
Actually the difference in weight you commie scum is due to the plastic asthenosphere
You're an angry little fricker, aren't you?
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:50 am to CptBengal
quote:depends on mass distribution too. More at the equator and less at the south pole means more gravity at the equator and less at the south pole. Duh. Physics 101 dumbass
The fricking mass hasn't changed. How in the frick would gravity...which is dependent on mass, change?
I have a feeling you're the kind of student who is good at making outlines but doesn't actually understand shite.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 9:56 am
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:55 am to Jim Rockford
The good news is this is a negative feedback mechanism! Less gravity at the south pole means the melting ice will flow into the ocean more slowly!
Posted on 10/1/14 at 9:59 am to SpidermanTUba
quote:
the good news is this is a negative feedback mechanism! Less gravity at the south pole means the melting ice will flow into the ocean more slowly!
And of course you knows this because you've read the tea leaves and smelled the magical unicorn farts
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News