re: Where are the threads criticizing Hindus and Buddhists?

Well it's a good thing we have you to sit on high and judge as to what's what.

quote:

---

Jeff, were you in a coma during the 9/11 tragedy? Are you unaware that the WTC was bombed several years before 8/11? Did you forget about the bombing of Pan Am flight 109, or the ships that were attacked?

---

Apparently you're not very well read up on things so I'll just giggle at this idiocy and move on.

quote:

---

Say what you will about America's strategy for combating terrorism,

---

Being a terrorist creates more terrorists. A vicious loop that the military industrialist fap over every night.

quote:

---

but you are insane if you really believe America deserved those attacks?

---

why does a country that has murdered millions over the years not deserve to get attacked? It's called self-defense.

quote:

---

Also, what about the attacks everywhere else in the world? Great Britain, Spain, Israel, India, Africa, etc? I guess they started it, too?

---

Educate yourself son...

quote:

---

Cause that explains the Sunni-on-Shia violence that has plagued the middle east for centuries...right?

Or the Luxor masscare, in which the victims were neutralist Swiss and Japanese tourists? Oh wait, I bet youre propaganda never established those basic concepts! maybe next time!

---

Stay focused douche! We're talking about America and it's enemies.

Hey tard...the whole point was to show how AMERICA has deserved everything that has come it's way due to it's murderous ways. And yet you keep throwing out these red herrings and now are accusing me of building strawmen? Are you new to this?

quote:

---

Hey tard...the whole point was to show how AMERICA has deserved everything that has come it's way due to it's murderous ways.

---

Great, now kindly explain away the justification for the tens of thousands of victims of Islamic violence I just provided. Take your time though, I know you've never heard of the Luxor massacre or the Hazara people until I just enlightened you. I'm so sorry the public education system failed you so badly

quote:

---

Hey tard...the whole point was to show how AMERICA has deserved everything that has come it's way due to it's murderous ways. And yet you keep throwing out these red herrings and now are accusing me of building strawmen? Are you new to this?

---

Also, I bet you're a HUGE fan of Russia's indiscriminate massacres of Chechnyan people. I bet your dumbass gives two fricks about the hundreds of civilians Putins government killed clearing out that auditorium or that gymnasium. reap what you sow dumb shite

quote:

---

And BTW douche. Since we're throwing out red herrings, I noticed your rather high post count in a short period of time. What else do you do besides linking to Winkipedia to make a point?

---

Holy shite...what a juvenile deflection

It's not that often that I can say I clearly won a debate but dude you just threw your cards up in the air. What a fricking pussy. Talking about post counts?

Why do you worry your pretty little head about such inane things Katy? You're always starting threads crying about some perceived wrong by some group. Constantly whining about others and playing the victim.

If you're not crying about the meanie liberals, or the poor pitiful teapartiers, you're complaining about black people and Muslims. Those are your only subjects.

Get a hobby. Get some air. Or better yet get fricked. And I say that in a kind way. You obviously need it.

The hoops that mental midget libtards like Bengal and DS will jump thru in order to avoid discussing a topic never ceases to amaze me.

This thread has nothing to do with anybody being a victim, sissy. It pertained to the typical, knee-jerk reactions of libtards anytime anybody expresses legitimate concern over the unparalleled proclivity that the Muslim community has for committing unilateral acts of violence.

You libtards can't refute the obvious, so you are reduced to employing Saul Alinsky type tactics in a pathetic attempt to demonize and marginalize anybody who brings up the subject.

But, this is a waste of time. A border collie could frame a better argument than the likes of you and Draconian Sanctions. You guys come here and embarrass yourselves with some of the inane, superficial comments that you make, but I can only surmise that you are too stupid to see how dumb you show yourselves to be.

But don't worry, Bengal. As much of a lightweight as you are, you apparently aren't quite as stupid as DS. He actually said the other day that Leonardo Dicaprio was not a hypocrite on the environment, because his carbon footprint was smaller than that of either India or China

As pathetic as some of you are, some of the arguments are so stupid that they are semi-entertaining. Now, if only you dumb bastards weren't allowed to vote.......

Based on the responses by liberals so far, here's another question:

So, when will it ever be "okay" to have an honest discussion about the proclivity that the Muslim population has for committing unilateral acts of violence? You liberals seem to be saying that, since not every Muslim commits acts of violence, that it is wrong, inappropriate, and even bigoted to bring up the subject.

Using that "logic," when would it be appropriate to talk about anything? Not all Germans were Nazi's, but that didn't keep FDR and Churchill from talking about the evil of Nazi Germany. Were they bigots to say that?

Let's talk about the police officer in Ferguson, MO. So far, we don't even know that he did anything wrong. But for argument's sake, let's say he did. Well, he's only one police officer, yet some of you have already condemned the entire FPD(something which has not been done to Muslims, btw). One poster here said, "Pigs gonna pig. Where was the outrage from you liberals when posters used the Ferguson incident to unfairly slander all policemen?

Of course, the answer is that there was no outrage, primarily because it was many liberals here who used the Ferguson incident to indict all cops. Even Eric Holder went to Ferguson and declared, "I am here as a black man."Was that warranted? Did that perhaps speak to some bigotry on his part?

The truth is, I started this thread to illuminate the hypocrisy of left-wing kooks like Bengal, DS, and so many more who will bend over backwards to indict an entire group based on the actions of one person, even if the actions of that one person may not have even been inappropriate. HOWEVER, let someone talk about the very real threat posed by Muslim violence in the name of Islam, and those same liberals unfairly accuse people of condemning all Muslims, when that is not the case at all. But, it does allow liberals to avoid having an honest discussion about the subject, doesn't it? How convenient.

I hope people here have read this thread, because I'm not sure that everybody is aware of the phony, hypocritical tactics of most liberals.