- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Missouri cop was badly beaten before shooting Michael Brown, says source
Posted on 8/20/14 at 3:51 pm to a want
Posted on 8/20/14 at 3:51 pm to a want
quote:
The Assistant (Police) Chief took him to the hospital, his face all swollen on one side,” said the insider. “He was beaten very severely.”
His buddies probably punched him in the face a couple of times to help with his story.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 3:59 pm to a want
quote:
I know...the source is probably a cop. But the facial fracture is a verifiable fact. It leads me to believe with great certainty Wilson's face was fractured. We don't know the whole story but it's not like a cop is stupid enough to try to put forth a narrative like that that if his face wasn't really fricked up. There will be x-rays, testimony of doctors, nurses, etc.
the thing is we don't know if the cop was involved in this story. at all.
We already saw this department try their hand at misinformation with the theft from the convenience store. they at a minimum misled there, if not out right lied. why would this be different? if it even was them.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:00 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Why the frick wouldn't they put this out on day one and spare us all this frickin sideshow?
Ratings.
I just spoke with one of my customers who lives there. I asked him if it was as bad as the media says it is.
From what he told me, it's being extremely sensationalized. He said there were maybe a group of 50 people protesting aggressively, and when they dispersed, they proceeded to loot, set things on fire, etc... The remainder of the people seen were just spectating.
He said he has zero issue getting around town, and very rarely, sees any major disturbances as he's going about his day to day business around town.
Take that fwiw.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:05 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
the thing is we don't know if the cop was involved in this story. at all.
We already saw this department try their hand at misinformation with the theft from the convenience store. they at a minimum misled there, if not out right lied. why would this be different? if it even was them.
I'm simply saying that a cop could lie about "he went for his gun". That could be subjective. "He charged him". Again, subjective. "His face was broken" on the other hand....there's no way to lie about that. There will be medical records to verify. It doesn'treally matter who the source is. I'm saying I'm confident Wilson's face was fractured b/c it's difficult to lie about that....unless you're a complete idiot.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:16 pm to Navytiger74
quote:
Why the frick wouldn't they put this out on day one and spare us all this frickin sideshow?
Because it most likely isn't true.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:22 pm to a want
quote:
says source
quote:
a source close
quote:
said the insider
quote:
well-placed source
quote:
the source said
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:39 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
"Well, no matter if he was a danger, shooting him six times was unjustified"
It all depends.
We all saw the Baden autopsy sketch. The msn may have been shot six times but how many of the six shots would have stopped a 300 pound man running at you? A big man who had already broken your face.
The arm wounds would not have and if the two shots to the head were 5 and 6 as reported then it's possible the cop had to do what he did.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:44 pm to DeathValley85
quote:
#Justice4Brown
Brown got justice. But since justice is in the eye of the beholder...nothing changes. "Behold, I will send them great delusion that they will believe a lie". (Biblical) People are losing it; and the manipulators are using it.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:47 pm to The Spleen
quote:
Why the frick wouldn't they put this out on day one and spare us all this frickin sideshow?
Because it most likely isn't true.
Early on they said the officer was "treated for facial injuries", you were too busy convicting the officer.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 4:57 pm to 91TIGER
quote:
Early on they said the officer was "treated for facial injuries", you were too busy convicting the officer.
I know they did. I just think they would have said that a fracture orbital bone was part of those facial injuries. I also think that lady that called the radio station claiming to be friend's with Wilson's wife/girlfriend would have mentioned that. Plus I don't really trust unnamed sources. You were too busy convicting Brown to give this claim any skepticism.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:01 pm to The Spleen
quote:
I just think they would have said that a fracture orbital bone was part of those facial injuries
Why you want them to be smearing that innocent child by alleging he had beat up a cop????
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:03 pm to a want
quote:
It doesn'treally matter who the source is. I'm saying I'm confident Wilson's face was fractured b/c it's difficult to lie about that....unless you're a complete idiot.
yes, if his face is in fact fractured. But it could always be done after the fact.
But who knows for sure, really only a handful of people? We will just have to wait and see on this one.
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:05 pm to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
LINK
this time the source is "close to wilson"
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:09 pm to a want
God I can't wait till this whole situation is over. Poor BHP is in hiding right now
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:11 pm to a want
but, but, but, but he's just a gentle giant.Telling FACTS like these are just character assassinatioN
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:17 pm to Hawkeye95
quote:
yes, if his face is in fact fractured. But it could always be done after the fact.
So what youre saying is evidence won't matter to you ......
This is what i dont get, im a white conservative but if the facts show the cop was at fault and there was a cover up on top of that, i will be the first one calling for the people involved to pay...... Why isn't it like that on both sides?
Posted on 8/20/14 at 5:27 pm to fleaux
"Well, no matter if he was a danger, shooting him six times was unjustified"
My questions to you are: have you ever fired a weapon in a 'combat' situation?
A semi-automatic pistol such as a Glock?
Have you ever been attacked in such a situation AFTER having had the hell beat out of you?
If you were attacked by someone 6'4", 240 pounds who had just kicked your arse, and you shot him and he kept coming, would you continue to shoot?
Firing a weapon in a combat situation, unless you've been in constant combat, your reflexes take over.
Three rapid taps with a semi-automatic pistol takes about a second. If the assailant kept coming, another three shots, another second.
Until you have been there it's easy to question how someone shot six times.
If you've ever been in such a situation, it's not hard to comprehend.
My questions to you are: have you ever fired a weapon in a 'combat' situation?
A semi-automatic pistol such as a Glock?
Have you ever been attacked in such a situation AFTER having had the hell beat out of you?
If you were attacked by someone 6'4", 240 pounds who had just kicked your arse, and you shot him and he kept coming, would you continue to shoot?
Firing a weapon in a combat situation, unless you've been in constant combat, your reflexes take over.
Three rapid taps with a semi-automatic pistol takes about a second. If the assailant kept coming, another three shots, another second.
Until you have been there it's easy to question how someone shot six times.
If you've ever been in such a situation, it's not hard to comprehend.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News