Started By
Message

Is not naming a starter hurting both QB's?

Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:08 am
Posted by ItsThatDude12
Giving out Mercy Knees
Member since Apr 2009
9927 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:08 am
If you go ahead and choose a guy he gets more reps with the 1's and better preparation going into the opener.

Seems like prolonging this hampers both guys and ends up hurting the guy who gets the nod.
Posted by TabledTiger
Venice
Member since Apr 2013
2254 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:09 am to
Hi Brian Hoyer....welcome to the Rant!
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10050 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:10 am to
What if neither has beaten the other out? When one of them proves they are better than the other, that QB will get the majority of the reps. I don't expect this to happen until after the first few games.
Posted by LSUengineer12
The Best Side
Member since Dec 2011
1850 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:11 am to
Maybe not naming a starter allows them to work as hard as they can while competing for the starting job, so that they both will be ready to step in and fill that role if needed.
Posted by blowmeauburn
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
7890 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:18 am to
Just accept now that this season will be a year with two quarterbacks playing 50% of the time.

And next year.

And the next.

I hate it. Think it robs the team of a true leader and doesn't allow any of them to get into a rhythm, but it's the way its gonna be.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25249 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:20 am to
The problem with this is it starts from the premise that Les Miles is telling you the truth.

Here is what we know for sure: Les Miles has not publicly named the starter. Both guys have gotten reps with the first team. That's it. We don't know the split, we don't know anything else.

My suspicion is, as this goes along, the guys know who the starter is going to be based on proportion of reps. Don't let paranoid Les' public misinformation campaign warp your perception.

Also, given your name, number of posts, and avi, tigrlee alter?
Posted by YouAre8Up
in a house
Member since Mar 2011
12792 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:20 am to
Please make this stop.........
Posted by LSUANDY25
Frisco
Member since Dec 2012
3087 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:45 am to
Miles has his reasons. Sit back and enjoy the ride, he'll pick the right QB, calm down.
Posted by Goldrush25
San Diego, CA
Member since Oct 2012
33794 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:51 am to
He could very well have his starter but he may be holding everything close to the vest right now.
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26708 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:57 am to
I'll name you a guy this worked out for last year.

Connor Cook

first 3 games splitting time 27/49 55% 279 yards (5.6 ypa) 4 TDs

Final 11 games 196/331 59.2% 2479 yards (7.5 ypa) 18 TDs 6 ints

Him and the other guy were battling it out the first three games. By Notre Dame, they had a starter.

I'm hoping for the same kind of curve. Our YPA should be higher, but we will throw the ball 90-100 times less than they did though.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64497 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:59 am to
quote:

Hi Brian Hoyer....welcome to the Rant!


sec brah. Its John E. Football.
Posted by Gray Tiger
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2004
36512 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:21 am to
Les should name a starter.
Then we can all sit back and watch the Rant explode.
Posted by themunch
Earth. maybe
Member since Jan 2007
64751 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:26 am to
Les likes reading the rant doing ranting.
Posted by Clark W Griswold
THE USA
Member since Sep 2012
10512 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:26 am to
Not naming a starter and not naming a starter publicly are two different things. The starter will know he is starting this weekend. He has to mentally prepare and Miles knows that. He doesn't have to hold a press conference or have a parade everytime a decision is made.
Posted by 2007lsuno1
Marietta, GA
Member since Aug 2009
6692 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:35 am to
NO.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
24367 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:45 am to
This morning on Sirius/XM they interviewed the Wisconsin coach who is not naming his starting QB either. Quote "Why would I let LSU know who to prepare for now?". They also noted that Saban said pretty much the same thing the day before but not specifically about LSU just opponents in general.



Posted by MrPackSix
Lakeview/God's Country
Member since Oct 2009
8220 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:48 am to
I know there's not a lot of game film on either Jennings or Harris but why would Miles tell Wisconsin which QB they need to prepare for?

Make them have a plan for both QBs
Posted by marcnbc
Bossier City, LA
Member since May 2004
4179 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 12:04 pm to
The players and coaches see who is doing better and who's getting a few more snaps with the one's. Miles is just keeping the competition going as long as possible, but they(coaches/players) have a very good idea of who will be starting next Saturday. May see both of them play next week...may not, but they'll both get plenty of PT during September to sort this out. Not a big concern IMO
Posted by Sev09
Nantucket
Member since Feb 2011
15571 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 12:18 pm to
LOL, no. If they both still think they have a chance, they'll both be competing and training as hard as possible. Iron sharpens iron.
Posted by tke857
Member since Jan 2012
12195 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 12:31 pm to
if anything it hurts the development of WR/QB relationship.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram