- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Our young defensive front vs. Wisconsin's running game...
Posted on 6/29/14 at 7:26 pm to TigerAlum93
Posted on 6/29/14 at 7:26 pm to TigerAlum93
We'll stop the run with numbers like Chavis always does
They are entirely to one dimensional on offense to give us much trouble
We have a decided talent advantage everywhere,Wisconsin is basically Iowa without a top ten defense
They are entirely to one dimensional on offense to give us much trouble
We have a decided talent advantage everywhere,Wisconsin is basically Iowa without a top ten defense
Posted on 6/29/14 at 7:37 pm to toughcrittercrumb
quote:
and their starting QB.
I'm pretty sure they are still figuring this out. Stave got hurt in bowl. Missed spring. They have more holes to fill than us. I'll take les miles in an opener.
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 6/29/14 at 7:54 pm to dgnx6
Let's remember the Badger's spring game score: 6-0. That Badger defense, the one that's replacing it's entire front seven, had no trouble stopping the run.
Yes, two Wisconsin starting OL sat out the spring game with injuries. What does that say about Wisconsin's depth at OL? Against a young defense?
LSU will win big.
Yes, two Wisconsin starting OL sat out the spring game with injuries. What does that say about Wisconsin's depth at OL? Against a young defense?
LSU will win big.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 7:55 pm to tigerblood29
I dont think either QB for either team will see much success throwing the ball this game. Our QB will be green (either way) going against an experienced secondary and their QB simply wont be good enough to exploit our secondary with White/Robinson/Collins locking down their receivers. Especially since they lose Abbrederis and Pederson and their next best returning receiver had 9 or 10 catches last season.
This game will be all about which OL abuses the other teams DL/LBs more and which RBs make more plays than the other. Both teams IMO have a sizable advantage in the run game over the opposing defense.
This game will be all about which OL abuses the other teams DL/LBs more and which RBs make more plays than the other. Both teams IMO have a sizable advantage in the run game over the opposing defense.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 8:01 pm to TigerAlum93
Their backup, Clement, is really good too. Played against him in high school.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 8:28 pm to thunderbird1100
I think the key is our DT's. If they show up and create havoc we have no worries. If they get pushed back into the LBers we could have a long night. However, I don't think that happens. We are unproven but deep at DT. I think Bain and Gilmore will provide quality depth like QT and CL did last season. Also I think we are deeper at RB and we punish that arse with the 3 headed monster of Magee, Fournette, and Hilliard.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 8:33 pm to NWLAtiger55
quote:
If they get pushed back into the LBers we could have a long night. However, I don't think that happens. We are unproven but deep at DT. I think Bain and Gilmore will provide quality depth like QT and CL did last season.
I think you're underestimating their OL.
Wisconsin constantly produces big, mean, NASTY Olinemen. They are going to have a 4th year junior, 3 5th year seniors and a 3rd year sophomore on their OL, all with some good to amazing experience. Their interior OL measures 6'6 322, 6'4 313 and 6'4 315 and they are nasty.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 8:33 pm to NWLAtiger55
Chief has PLENTY of time to prepare fow Wis.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 8:49 pm to thunderbird1100
You're right they definitely have the size and experience up front on the O line, but so do we. I guess what I'm trying to get at is I think our DT's are key. I think we have more depth up front on the D line than they do. We will be more fresh throughout the game and I'll take our O line and RBs against anybody this year.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 8:59 pm to toughcrittercrumb
Bend don't break. We pull away in the the 2nd half and beat them by 17-21 pts.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:00 pm to toughcrittercrumb
Damn.. Gordon reminds me a lot of Jamaal Charles after watching that vid. Dude is a stud.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:01 pm to NWLAtiger55
quote:
Posted by Message NWLAtiger55 Our young defensive front vs. Wisconsin's running game... You're right they definitely have the size and experience up front on the O line, but so do we. I guess what I'm trying to get at is I think our DT's are key. I think we have more depth up front on the D line than they do. We will be more fresh throughout the game and I'll take our O line and RBs against anybody this year.
Until we see how Fournette's 1st year turns out, you have to give Wisky the advantage at RB. IMO, OL is a push. I'm not sure how good Wisky's pass blocking is, but they can definitely run block.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:05 pm to NWLAtiger55
quote:
NWLAtiger55 Our young defensive front vs. Wisconsin's running game... I think the key is our DT's. If they show up and create havoc we have no worries. If they get pushed back into the LBers we could have a long night. However, I don't think that happens. We are unproven but deep at DT. I think Bain and Gilmore will provide quality depth like QT and CL did last season. Also I think we are deeper at RB and we punish that arse with the 3 headed monster of Magee, Fournette, and Hilliard.
I think Bain will be very, very good. When the coaches were asked about young players, Bain was a name that came up often as a player who will be a factor. I wouldn't be surprised if he passes up Thomas at the other DT position. IMO, Bain seems like he has a build similar to Bennie Logan. I'm very excited about these young DL.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:11 pm to PhiTiger1764
quote:
Posted by Message PhiTiger1764 Our young defensive front vs. Wisconsin's running game... Damn.. Gordon reminds me a lot of Jamaal Charles after watching that vid. Dude is a stud.
Yeah. He is dangerous. He averaged almost 10 ypc. That's why I don't know why some Tiger fans would give the RB advantage to us. Until Fournette suits up, you have to give Wisky the advantage.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:12 pm to toughcrittercrumb
You make a valid point for sure. Other than Gordon who do they have at RB I'm curious( not being a smart arse). If Fournette is as good as he's hyped up to be I have to give us the advantage their. Magee has proven himself and Hilliard is hard to stop in the red zone. I guess I'm just an LSU homer haha.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:15 pm to toughcrittercrumb
This is a game to see how the new O-line coach has changed this offense. Men pushing men around is the key to everything.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:19 pm to NWLAtiger55
Nm
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 9:21 pm
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:20 pm to NWLAtiger55
Posted by Message
NWLAtiger55
Our young defensive front vs. Wisconsin's running game...
You make a valid point for sure. Other than Gordon who do they have at RB I'm curious( not being a smart arse). If Fournette is as good as he's hyped up to be I have to give us the advantage their. Magee has proven himself and Hilliard is hard to stop in the red zone. I guess I'm just an LSU homer haha.
Corey Clements
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:21 pm to toughcrittercrumb
It should also be mentioned that Wisconsin won't be a finesse team like Oregon. They will act like we do when the opponent can't stop us running the ball down its throat. Wisconsin will run it down ours.
I don't know why so many of our fans seem to think that this is a walkover opponent. Wisconsin will not be intimidated by us at all.
I don't know why so many of our fans seem to think that this is a walkover opponent. Wisconsin will not be intimidated by us at all.
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:23 pm to Eternally Undefeated
I only compared Wisky to Oregon because both teams are top 15 programs. Wisky is definitely a different style of team than Oregon.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News