Started By
Message

re: Renting out property without mortgage holder's consent

Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:30 am to
Posted by rmc
Truth or Consequences
Member since Sep 2004
26569 posts
Posted on 6/28/14 at 9:30 am to
quote:

shite, I wasn't even aware the mortgage holder could keep you from renting. Well, "could" is a wrong word, I just didn't think it was prevalent. Sort of like how I've never run into a loan that had a prepayment penalty.


Failing to use and occupy the property as a residence is almost always an act of default under residential mortgages. Most mortgage companies honestly don't care as long as they are getting paid. Especially the large services. /not legal advice./
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39626 posts
Posted on 6/29/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Failing to use and occupy the property as a residence is almost always an act of default under residential mortgages. Most mortgage companies honestly don't care as long as they are getting paid. Especially the large services. /not legal advice./


Sad part is I'm a lawyer...Good news is I wouldn't nail you on the legal advice.

I always figured the "non occupation" was more along the lines of lack of maintenance and abandonment. But whatever floats their boat.
This post was edited on 6/29/14 at 9:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram