- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Pels trying to acquire a draft pick
Posted on 6/13/14 at 9:54 pm
Posted on 6/13/14 at 9:54 pm
quote:
Alex Kennedy @AlexKennedyNBA · 5h
The Knicks, Blazers, Kings and Pelicans are among the teams trying to acquire picks in this year's draft, according to league sources.
Kennedy is one of the better NBA guys so this has some legs
inb4patricyoung
inb4gordonfor8
7
Posted on 6/13/14 at 10:02 pm to LosLobos111
Patric young
Gordon for 8
frick
Gordon for 8
quote:
Inb4patricyoung inb4gordonfor8
frick
Posted on 6/13/14 at 10:58 pm to LosLobos111
43rd pick for a 2017 2nd round pick
Posted on 6/13/14 at 11:54 pm to LosLobos111
A lot of 2nd rounds picks for sale considering half of them belong to 3 teams 
Posted on 6/13/14 at 11:55 pm to LosLobos111
I wonder if Philly is willing to trade back that #10 overall...
Posted on 6/14/14 at 10:47 am to LosLobos111
quote:
Pelicans aggressively trying to trade into 1st round in hopes of drafting a small forward or center, sources say.2014 1st dealt in Jrue deal
Marc Spears Twitter
This post was edited on 6/14/14 at 10:48 am
Posted on 6/14/14 at 11:09 am to LosLobos111
Posted on 6/14/14 at 6:37 pm to LosLobos111
Well the thing about giving up future picks is this: How many players is that team away from becoming a legit team?
In other words, if you only have a serious need at 1 position and could get a guy that you want at that spot... giving up a future pick isnt a bad idea. If you have a team where you have serious needs at multiple spots, it might be a bad idea.
The way I see it, we already have our franchise player in AD who has a shot to be an all time great. We already have a really good young PG in Holiday. We have got a versatile player that can play the 1,2, or 3 in Tyreke and he really came on hot in the last month once Monty figured out how to use him. And we have our sharp shooter / mismatch in Anderson.
We are a 3 and a 5 away from being a really really good team. If we can address 1 of those needs in this draft by giving up a future pick, Im all for it. The 5 position is such a crapshoot in the draft IMO. I would rather address the 5 in FA if possible. I would take a proven player in the NBA at the 5 position over a 18-19 year old draft pick that played 1 year in college.
And I would love it if we are able to somehow dish Gordon and get anything in return.
In other words, if you only have a serious need at 1 position and could get a guy that you want at that spot... giving up a future pick isnt a bad idea. If you have a team where you have serious needs at multiple spots, it might be a bad idea.
The way I see it, we already have our franchise player in AD who has a shot to be an all time great. We already have a really good young PG in Holiday. We have got a versatile player that can play the 1,2, or 3 in Tyreke and he really came on hot in the last month once Monty figured out how to use him. And we have our sharp shooter / mismatch in Anderson.
We are a 3 and a 5 away from being a really really good team. If we can address 1 of those needs in this draft by giving up a future pick, Im all for it. The 5 position is such a crapshoot in the draft IMO. I would rather address the 5 in FA if possible. I would take a proven player in the NBA at the 5 position over a 18-19 year old draft pick that played 1 year in college.
And I would love it if we are able to somehow dish Gordon and get anything in return.
This post was edited on 6/14/14 at 6:39 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News