Started By
Message

"OT 10's" are not achievable because you need time with them. Can't be in a pic.

Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:32 am
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27020 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:32 am
My submission would be 1995-98 Jennifer Anniston. Again I will NOT submit a pic because an OT 10 transcends pics. I just saw bits and pieces of Object of My Affection. The plot is annoying but it is watchable because she is SO hot at that time.

Pics are helpful but not needed with OT 10's. The name should be mentioned and all men of the OT should grunt like an ape in agreement or disagreement.

In closing a pic of a and om beautiful woman does not a 10 make. A 10 must be cultivated over years of hotness and getting to know her, hear the person speak or act, and have her not get fat or ate up,with the skank.

Discuss.

Again you may bash for no pics. I understand. But a TEN needs no pics. Again... Discuss and submit.
Posted by Fusaichi Pegasus
Meh He Co
Member since Oct 2010
14572 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:35 am to
go bring this homeaux talk elsewhere











or if reverse psychology













Posted by Commandeaux
Zachary
Member since Jul 2009
7310 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:40 am to
beta
Posted by SouthOfSouth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2008
43463 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:41 am to
I think a 10 still needs pics. But I agree it transcends looks alone.
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68379 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:45 am to
its easier to beat off with pics.

Posted by djangochained
Gardere
Member since Jul 2013
19054 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:54 am to
Give this one 2-3 years

Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76552 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:10 am to
My standards are low. Your mom isn't hot but I hit it anyway.
Posted by Odinson
Asgard
Member since Apr 2014
2760 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:05 pm to
Posted by PhifeDogg
Stankonia
Member since Mar 2006
6048 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:08 pm to
LSU alum wannabe "the type of n!gga to search 'personality' on pornhub."
This post was edited on 5/9/14 at 7:22 pm
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
142506 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:23 pm to
quote:

My submission would be 1995-98 Jennifer Anniston
holy frick

explain to someone who never watched friends why she is any more than average
Posted by LucasP
Member since Apr 2012
21618 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:35 pm to
'let's talk about beautiful women, but no pics' = 'let's all get in a pile and just start getting gay with each other'

I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here.
Posted by lsu480
Downtown Scottsdale
Member since Oct 2007
92877 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 7:37 pm to
Im not gonna lie...your OP is kinda gay! Of course a persons wife should be a 10 to them and that takes time but there is also nothing wrong with looking at a random woman and judging her looks.
Posted by Casty McBoozer
your mom's fat arse
Member since Sep 2005
35495 posts
Posted on 5/9/14 at 8:54 pm to
quote:

My submission would be 1995-98 Jennifer Anniston.

I was not all that impressed with her back then. Yes, she was very attractive, but I can't stand a bunch of hype.

I think current Jennifer Anniston > '95 - '98 Jennifer Anniston. I think she's gotten way sexier with age.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram