- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Aborted Babies from Canada being burned and used for power... UPDATE on Page 6
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:10 pm to The Baker
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:10 pm to The Baker
quote:
Say the would be parents wanted a burial, they now have that option.
Did they not have it before?
quote:
The hospitals could incorporate another disposal method.
Such as?
2
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:11 pm to The Baker
So the peeps that aborted the fetus would pay for a burial?
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:12 pm to The Baker
quote:
Say the would be parents wanted a burial, they now have that option.
And if they don't want a burial (probably the majority of cases) they would....
quote:
The hospitals could incorporate another disposal method.
Which would be.....
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:12 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
Green Chili Tiger
Stop typing so fast brah
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:18 pm to onmymedicalgrind
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:28 am
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:19 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
I just think its funny the ones outright attacking the other posters are mad at our lack of morality.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:20 pm to The Baker
quote:
I think most people could reason that not all waste has to be disposed of by generating heat.
So you have no problem with the waste being burned, you just have a problem if there is energy generated and captured from it? ( Sorry onmymedicalgrind I'm trying to go slower)
This post was edited on 4/24/14 at 5:21 pm
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:22 pm to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
( Sorry onmymedicalgrind I'm trying to go slower)
I actually just gave up, it's all you 
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:23 pm to Jcorye1
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:28 am
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:24 pm to onmymedicalgrind
You should stick around. I'm just about out of here.
This post was edited on 4/24/14 at 5:25 pm
Posted on 4/24/14 at 5:29 pm to Green Chili Tiger
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:28 am
Posted on 4/24/14 at 7:48 pm to The Baker
quote:
Autoclaves being a common alternative.
So incineration is bad but high presure steam cooking is ok? Wow.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 7:52 pm to The Baker
quote:
mandated by that county would send expenses through the roof.
Well it is more expensive which is exactly what is needed
The waste will still be incinerated, it just won't be in a way that makes delicate flowers like you wilt. Congrats on nothing.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 8:06 pm to The Baker
quote:
I think most people could reason that not all waste has to be disposed of by generating heat.
I say the amount of BTUs from burning a fetus is negligible. It might be a net loss. Chunking aborted babies into a furnace makes me think of Dachau.
Posted on 4/24/14 at 10:38 pm to Clames
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:28 am
Posted on 4/24/14 at 10:42 pm to son of arlo
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/11/21 at 1:28 am
Posted on 4/25/14 at 7:55 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
No big deal
i agree on one level (i mean, once you accept that abortion is ok, then what difference does this make)
but i think this is one of those, "waitaminnit"-type indicators that offends the sensibilities. and should.
This post was edited on 4/25/14 at 7:56 am
Posted on 4/25/14 at 8:05 am to Green Chili Tiger
quote:
So you have no problem with the waste being burned, you just have a problem if there is energy generated and captured from it?
i have a problem with Oregon actually shipping in dead babies specifically for this use. what's a dead baby going for these days?
this isn't being done at some hospital as medical waste...they're being shipped in and burned at a power facility
This post was edited on 4/25/14 at 8:07 am
Posted on 4/25/14 at 8:11 am to BlackHelicopterPilot
quote:
WRONG!!
That is the misconception. They are NOT "burning the tissue for energy". They are using energy to burn the tissue. They do NOT start the fire and keep adding tissue to keep it burning (like logs on a campfire).
The get a fire going, keep adding GAS to it to burn the tissue.
Think of the campfire...if you keep adding steak to the fire...does the fire keep burning? NO. You have to keep adding logs in order to be able to cook the steak.
Actually he's right and you're wrong. The way that these work is that the wastes are combusted in boilers. Inside the boiler it's like a big pit of burning campfire with all kinds of paper, furniture, and other combustible material. The heat generated from the combustion of this material is used to heat steam which is then used to both supply steam to another facility (nearly all of these are cogeneration facilities) and to generate power from a steam turbine. The local utility then is required by law to buy the power that is generated.
Natural gas is a supplemental fuel because the heats of combustions of these materials all over the place.
Page 7 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News