re: Shift in Tone After Feminists Learn Identity of News Outlet Interviewing Them

I hate fragmented pieces like that, cutting in and out of events.


Not sayings its made up, but it is easier to twist words.

For instance, when she asked a question and then suddenly cut away when the person responded.


But they didn't cut away later in the video with a different person.


What, was the first response not inflammatory enough to warrant inclusion? So basically the reporter is admitting you are cherry picking events to suit a narrative.

So for all we know, 90% of people actually responded (even after being "warned") and they edited them out.


Not saying that's what happened.

I don't know.

And that's the point.

That's the consequence of drive by editing.