Started By
Message

re: Per Source, Sproles next to be cut

Posted on 3/7/14 at 5:33 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 5:33 pm to
Rapoport is usually legit, but this contradicts the earlier report that Sproles wasn't being touched.

Confusing much?

I do agree 100% with cutting(or trading) Sproles though as he saves the most($3.5m) with very little dead money($750k) and will be 31.

And imo opinion he's more replaceable than Thomas is at this point in his career. His return game has tanked, he rarely gets used on the run, and he is too small to be an effective blocker.

Basically he had become a slot receiver.
This post was edited on 3/7/14 at 5:34 pm
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18971 posts
Posted on 3/7/14 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Rapoport is usually legit, but this contradicts the earlier report that Sproles wasn't being touched.


This is the season of the smokescreen.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram