Started By
Message

re: OT potheads, what's your opinion of "wax?"

Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:37 am to
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15049 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

If that's all you're getting at then in apologize and agree with you



So maybe this helps you understand where I'm really trying to go with this:
Let's say 1% of people are allergic to Penicillin. It's rare for someone who has received it with no problems to have a problem with it (let's say another 1%). They make a new penicillin. People who used to take penicillin just fine are now allergic to the new stuff at a rate of 15%. You are probably safer in suggesting people use the old penicillin instead of the new stuff, because it's safer and has fewer side effects.
Posted by burgeman
Member since Jun 2008
10368 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:39 am to
I like how you are basically agreeing with everyone but they keep thinking you are attacking them.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
67023 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 9:41 am to
quote:

They make a new penicillin. People who used to take penicillin just fine are now allergic to the new stuff at a rate of 15%.


I get that. What I'm trying to explain is "wax" is not something new. It's just weed with a scary name and a propagandists spin. Literally no different at all except concentrated. Like the difference between a beer and a shot of everclear.
This post was edited on 2/27/14 at 9:42 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram