Started By
Message

re: An interesting stat regarding the Heat's consistency

Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:07 pm to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111202 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

To argue that the addition of Turner doesn't make Indy better than they were last year is only one a biased fan would make. 
again, Stan van Gundy flat out said the Pacers were better off with Granger as opposed to Turner. He is not a biased Heat fan.
Posted by The_Man_of_Steel
Member since Jan 2014
289 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:10 pm to
Well if Stan Van Gundy said it, then there is absolutely no disputing it. It's settled folks.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:12 pm to
Granger wasn't active last year. The original point was that this Pacers team is currently better than last year's team that took Miami to 7.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111202 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

Well if Stan Van Gundy said it, then there is absolutely no disputing it. It's settled folks.
you can at least try to keep up
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13611 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:23 pm to
quote:

Well if Stan Van Gundy said it, then there is absolutely no disputing it.
SVG's opinion >>>> some random internet tard trying to argue evan turner is a good defender
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111202 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Granger wasn't active last year. The original point was that this Pacers team is currently better than last year's team that took Miami to 7. 


 


sure they are, but you weren't debating the original point, you had moved on to saying basically any non Heat Heat fan would think Turner is an upgrade, and I'm saying that is factually incorrect.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111202 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

SVG's opinion >>>> some random internet tard trying to argue evan turner is a good defender

To be fair, that's not even my argument.
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:32 pm to
No, my original point was that the pacers were a better team this year than last and a fanboy disputed it. Why, IDK but if you don't proclaim the Heat are the best team ever around here you're a hater It's obvious they are better, potentially a lot better with Turner and anything Bynum could possibly give.

And did you really just say that it's factually incorrect that Turner is a better player than Granger? I hope you meant to say defender, because if not you look pretty ridiculous for calling out people disagreeing with Stan Van Gundy while essentially doing the same thing with the Pacers front office
This post was edited on 2/24/14 at 9:36 pm
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:41 pm to
Good god that must be some crazy odds
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:42 pm to
quote:

To argue that the addition of Turner doesn't make Indy better than they were last year is only one a biased fan would make.
He won't, but whatever. You can continue to believe whatever non-sense you would like.

Evan Turner is the new Rudy Gay.
Posted by ZTiger87
Member since Nov 2009
11536 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:43 pm to
quote:

And did you really just say that it's factually incorrect that Turner is a better player than Granger?


There are no stats that show it's an upgrade. The offensive stats are similar and Granger has been much better on defense. We'll see how much of that has to do with the teams they played on though. I think it's pretty telling that all Philly could get for Turner (and taking on salary) was a 2nd round pick.
Posted by theducks
Where The Blazers Play
Member since Aug 2013
13746 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

What playoff game has the NBA ever "gifted" the heat?


Game 2 vs. The Celtics in '11 iirc.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34986 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:52 pm to
I'd rather have Bynum/Scola/Turner than Granger/Psycho T/insert center.

The risk vs. reward is there for the Pacers. If they have home court I still like their chances, but it really all comes down to the health and consistency of Wade.
Posted by Dr. Shultz
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jun 2013
6391 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Game 2 vs. The Celtics in '11 iirc.



What happened?

Just checked. The Heat went on a 14-0 run in the last 7 minutes of the game and won by double digits.

Obviously rigged
This post was edited on 2/24/14 at 9:58 pm
Posted by PortCityTiger24
Member since Dec 2006
87455 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:55 pm to
Larry Bird < jturn17


It's all good. From what I've read you are typically solid. We'll agree to disagree on this one
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

And to the Greg Oden vs Bynum debate.. Bynum is by far the better player
Is he? Bynum's FG% is 42% as a 7 footer. it's very possible that he's just done and that his knees are shot beyond repair.
Posted by LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Member since Jan 2008
13611 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Greg Oden vs Bynum debate.. Bynum is by far the better player
Is he? Bynum's FG% is 42% as a 7 footer. it's very possible that he's just done and that his knees are shot beyond repair.
what do they have? 1/2 a good knee between them? ?
Posted by Dr. Shultz
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Jun 2013
6391 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 9:59 pm to
quote:

Is he? Bynum's FG% is 42% as a 7 footer. it's very possible that he's just done and that his knees are shot beyond repair.



I agree Bynum is probably done being an above average player but he at least played at an all star level for a year or 2. Oden has never had a good season and has bad knee problems just like Bynum.

I agree Oden will get better and Bynum get worst but its understandable to say Bynum is\was the better player win healthy
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
111202 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 10:02 pm to
quote:

And did you really just say that it's factually incorrect that Turner is a better player than Granger?
no. I said it's factually incorrect to state the only people saying Turner isn't an upgrade over biased Heat fans.
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 2/24/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Oden has never had a good season
This actually isn't true. When Oden has been healthy he's been pretty freaking good.

His career per 36m are around 15pts 12 rbs and 2 blks.

The battle for him has always been health not skill level.


As far as Turner goes, I get why Bird did it, but it's a move for the future. It's fully a Stephenson insurance policy. They're afraid someone is going to max him out, which will prevent them from being able to max. This way they'll be able to have Turner's bird rights to not get much worse.

The problem is while Turner may be a better player than Granger that doesn't mean he'll fit the Pacers system as well as Granger did this year, even if Granger hasn't been good. Granger accepted a lesser role because he loved the team. There's no proof that Turner will do that. Plus he's in a contract year. I can easily see him chucking up shots when he's in the game because he needs to keep his numbers up so he can get $$$$ in the off season. The main reason I can see it not mattering is because the Pacers offense is already so shite that Turner isn't bad enough to make them any worse than they already are. Anyway, that's my stance on the whole thing. I see why the Pacers did it, but I don't think it was a move for this season. I think it was insurance for the future.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram