Started By
Message

Re-sign the O-Line

Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:16 am
Posted by Waldeaux24
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2013
278 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 12:16 am
While I completely agree that we need to look for replacements in the coming years, I'm not sold on drafting O-line in the first 2 rounds. They proved in the last few games that they could play ball together. DLP is clearly the weakest link, but he's serviceable and we could do a lot worse than him. Strief shouldn't be too expensive either. I say we re-sign the pair at a reasonable cost. Then go WR/CB/BPA in the first few rounds, then look for developmental players along the line. Thoughts?
This post was edited on 1/22/14 at 12:18 am
Posted by signalizer
IN A VAN DOWN BY THE RIVER
Member since Aug 2011
162 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 2:25 am to
I would never draft a center in the first or second round. You can usually get the best in the draft in the third or fourth. I think most on here that did the mock website waited until the 3rd or later to draft a replacement for DLP.
Posted by Unknown_Poster
Member since Jun 2013
5758 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 2:39 am to
You're better off with draft picks than those two.
This post was edited on 1/22/14 at 2:40 am
Posted by St Augustine
The Pauper of the Surf
Member since Mar 2006
64391 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 5:36 am to
Disagree about DLP we need a replacement. Strief would be OK on a friendly deal. We simply have to protect our 35 year old qb if we want to legitimately have a shot at winning the thing. The time for getting by with journeymen projects, late round picks, etc is over. Time to take some of the burden off Drew.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64499 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 6:52 am to
quote:

Thoughts?


Upgrade the center position.
Try to re-sign Streif.
Burn Drews gloves.
Posted by Patrick O Rly
y u do dis?
Member since Aug 2011
41187 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 8:35 am to
It would be nice to have some continuity, but it might not be practical.
Posted by blueslover
deeper than deep south
Member since Sep 2007
22792 posts
Posted on 1/22/14 at 10:44 am to
quote:

re-sign the pair at a reasonable cost

That's the trick. It's not as easy as it might sound. What is reasonable? How do you correlate contract to performance? What is their value on the open market? Where are you at with the cap and how will the signings affect that? How do their ages and expected longevity play into the O Line long term plan? Who do you have on the roster as possible fills before free agency & draft?

-I think Strief is more likely back. Played pretty well this year for the amount of grief he gets

-dlP I might go more likely back than not. Hoping no myself. I'm not much on re-signing players described as "we could do a lot worse than him". Could likely get the #1 center in the 2nd Rd. Certainly could still get a day one starter in the 3rd Rd. Upgrade ability, go cheaper, younger, and have the future in sight. I saw Stork was playing guard at the Sr Bowl. The ideal plan for me would be a top center that could slide over to guard in another year or two as Grubbs & Evans get older (along with their $20mil cap cost).

Loomis pointedly mentioned Lelito at the Sr Bowl. Could be the next guy up. When it comes to evaluating players outside of games we really don't have a clue how they see guys.
This post was edited on 1/22/14 at 10:56 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram