- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Great read on why paying college athletes would NOT be doomsday
Posted on 7/26/13 at 6:01 am
Posted on 7/26/13 at 6:01 am
From Sports on Earth
From the end of the article:
From the end of the article:
quote:
For the sake of argument, however, suppose current cost structures remained fixed. Florida women's lacrosse can't function without a $15 million building. There is no way to replace Louisville athletic director Tom Jurich with a perfectly competent executive who will accept less than Jurich's $1.4 million annual salary. Now suppose that in a free market, schools have to shake the couch cushions and come up with, say, 50 percent more money to compensate and/or bid for revenue sport athletes. Guess what? They could find the money. Without slashing women's rowing. Fact: sports are a small part of overall campus budgets. In 2009-2010, total expenses for non-revenue sports (that's for everything, not just scholarships) at Florida were $79.5 million -- approximately three percent of total campus revenue. At Michigan, the University of Maryland, the University of Illinois and UCLA, total non-revenue sports expenses over the same period were approximately one percent of the same. If schools truly value scholarships in sports like field hockey and track, they can find ways to pay for them -- just like they do in the here and now, even as overall expenses go up.
Contrary to his self-serving, fear-mongering public pronouncements, Remy is smart. So is Delany. So are many of the people running college athletics. They might be disingenuous, paternalistic and unwilling to share their toys with the other kids in the sandbox, but they're also adaptable. If O'Bannon wins, they'll adjust. More than a half-century ago, the NCAA adopted something called "the Sanity Code," which permitted schools to offer athletes need-based financial aid for tuition -- a once unthinkable, amateurism-sullying practice -- but not money for room and board. Arguing for the rule, association president Karl Leib warned that anything more generous would create "chaos worse than anything we ever dreamed of" while fretting that "if athletes are obtained on the open market, I pity the schools who cannot bid high." A year later, the Sanity Code was dead; today, Kentucky men's basketball players reside in a $7 million player dormitory that includes a private chef.
The end is always nigh. Except when it isn't.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 6:27 am to Sophandros
College athletes already get paid
Posted on 7/26/13 at 8:23 am to Sophandros
I think it's dumb that the large majority of athletes are not being compensated for their time in college football. Go look at a team store like Texas A&M Football. I can gauarantee you that the first jersey you see is a #2 jersey. There is no name on the back of the jersey, but EVERYONE KNOWS who that jersey represents. Look at AJ Green when he was at Georgia. There were #8 jerseys everywhere. Now you will struggle to find a #8 Georgia jersey in any store. The NCAA as a whole capitalizes on these kids' names without giving them a single dime. Same thing as EA Sports and their college game. Literally the only thing missing from their games were the names associated with the players.
That sure as shite looks like Tim Tebow to me. The player likeness in it is insane.
Looks like Johnny Football here as well.
They need to compensate these kids, end of story.
That sure as shite looks like Tim Tebow to me. The player likeness in it is insane.
Looks like Johnny Football here as well.
They need to compensate these kids, end of story.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 8:29 am to Sophandros
quote:
Guess what? They could find the money. Without slashing women's rowing. Fact: sports are a small part of overall campus budgets. In 2009-2010, total expenses for non-revenue sports (that's for everything, not just scholarships) at Florida were $79.5 million -- approximately three percent of total campus revenue. At Michigan, the University of Maryland, the University of Illinois and UCLA, total non-revenue sports expenses over the same period were approximately one percent of the same. If schools truly value scholarships in sports like field hockey and track, they can find ways to pay for them
many schools, especially state schools, are in budgetary crises. i wonder how they will "find the money"
...especially once the student loan bubble bursts
quote:
Replace guarantee-game creampuffs with regular opponents. Let Plonsky go -- most schools manage to endure with a single, non-gender-specific athletic director. Cut Dodds' salary in half. Trim $300,000 from each of the remaining categories. Congratulations: you just covered the $4.2 million cost of all non-revenue sport athletic scholarships at Texas. All via savings the school could achieve right now, without waiting for the resolution of the O'Bannon case.
this is just ridiculous
typical progressive authoritarian command
just like the assumption that the players choosing to go to college are not rational enough to make their own decision. ridiculous and a complete lie made just to make some point. classic prog behavior
This post was edited on 7/26/13 at 8:30 am
Posted on 7/26/13 at 10:33 am to Sophandros
There will always be the counter argument.
Who gets paid what? Do qbs get more than punters? Do the marketable guys get more? Does Dukes basketball team get more than their football team? If so, athletes would chose schools based on money, not coaches and education.
Who gets paid what? Do qbs get more than punters? Do the marketable guys get more? Does Dukes basketball team get more than their football team? If so, athletes would chose schools based on money, not coaches and education.
Posted on 7/26/13 at 4:27 pm to Sophandros
Fun fact: Donald Remy, the Vice President of NCAA legal affairs quoted in the article went to LSU.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News