Started By
Message

re: Clifton Garrett ran a 4.79

Posted on 7/5/13 at 11:23 am to
Posted by Dubz17
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2013
1173 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 11:23 am to
Do not want
Posted by Memphis
Fenway Park
Member since Jun 2013
6302 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 12:38 pm to
Nitwit says he's still not fast enough
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12234 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 12:45 pm to
Not qute what i said, is it, Memphis?
Nor did I say or suggest he was not a valuable prospect.
But I did say his meaurables suggest he's overrated. And I said his speed is comparable to Mati Teo's.
Now, are you going to enighten the discussion by referring to freight trains or "closing speed"?
Posted by Memphis
Fenway Park
Member since Jun 2013
6302 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Not qute what i said, is it, Memphis?

quote:

Look at Garrett's scores. He about 4.8 in 40, as was Teo at the combines. I see Garrett's press and his stars, just like everyone else. Those ratings must be despite not having exceptional speed. As I recall, his overall SPARQ #'s are not in the top half at Opening, although that is top level competition.


quote:

Sorry, guys. You can use all the catch phrases you want, but you can't "hit like a freight train", if you don't get there in time to make the tackle. And no one says the 40 is an end all, be all,as fantasized by one poster. Here's another old sports saying: "There's no substitute for speed". Garrett may be a very good LB, but his meaurables aren't supportive of his current rating. If he Notre Dame as his first choice, many here wouldn't give him a second glance.


quote:

But I did say his meaurables suggest he's overrated. And I said his speed is comparable to Mati Teo's.

So kevin minter was overrated? Terrell Suggs?

So a 17 yr old ran faster than a college senior? But he's comparable?

quote:

Now, are you going to enighten the discussion by referring to freight trains or "closing speed"?

You're right Chavis is wrong. Chief loves the kid and thinks he can make an immediate impact. But you're right, he's overrated and has no closing speed. But yet he was one of the best LB at the opening. But he's overrated amirite?




0/10
This post was edited on 7/5/13 at 12:54 pm
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

meaurables
are
quote:

overrated


quote:

And I said his speed is comparable to Mati Teo's


He only ran one forty yard dash. During the Sparq championship, safety Tray Matthews, ran a 4.53 his first time and a 4.34 on his final attempt. A HUGE difference.

A LB during the finals ran a 4.7 his first attempt and 4.55 his second.
Posted by belowmebama
Member since Jul 2008
7304 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 1:09 pm to
I love how some will break down a measurable from a kid and complain knowing damn well they couldn't come close to running a 4.8 even if they ran it downhill with Katrina winds behind them being pulled by a semi with a space shuttle parachute on the front of the truck.
Posted by smash williams
San Diego
Member since Apr 2009
19744 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 1:21 pm to
Maybe you should start by posting times updated on 247 from The Opening.

And Garrett should be compared to his peers not LBs that were in the NFL or participated in the Draft, kid is about to be a SR in HS. Raekwon McMillan ran a 4.79 and Kain Daub ran a 4.87.
This post was edited on 7/5/13 at 1:36 pm
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12234 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 2:15 pm to
Thanks for acknowledging what I actually said, Memphis.
And thanks also for bringing up Minter to compare.
Minter was a 4 star and ranked 17 at ILB ( Rivals).
Don't know about his last HS time, but he had 4.67 at LSU Pro Day.
Seems that Minter actually supports the argument Garret's measurables don't justify his current ratings.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12234 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 2:21 pm to
BTW, Kevin Sheppard is listed with a 40 time at 4.7, but has a low time of 4.6.
These players are faster than Garrett's best to date. Maybe he gets faster, maybe "Moffitt gets a hold of him"...
Point is, he has elite ranking, but not elite measurables.
Posted by G- Man
Member since Dec 2005
857 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 2:25 pm to
Nit-Pic
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 3:37 pm to
Minter ran a 4.81 at the combine.
Posted by belowmebama
Member since Jul 2008
7304 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 3:52 pm to
quote:

Point is, he has elite ranking, but not elite measurables.


So for someone to be "elite" and deserving a 5 star rating you feel they should run a sub 4.7 at 230lbs?

He gets his elite ranking for a lot more than just measurables. Upside is taken into account. Football knowledge, scheme, tackling ability, etc. all play a factor.

I had a good friend that was a 4* LB out of high school and there wasn't much that I saw that I thought he was something all world that coaches would drool over. He played as a freshman at LSU and played all 4yrs with a stint in the NFL. I would say 85% of the reason for his success was how smart he was and how hard he worked. He couldn't catch for shite, wasnt the fastest guy or biggest guy on the field either.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12234 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 5:22 pm to
Below,
Some succeed despite their measurables.
Manti Teo ran a 4.8 and contended for the Heismann.
In my view, FWIW, he could only do that at ND.
He would not have done as well in the SEC, either, contending with that speed.
Garrett's overall SPARQ scores were in the bottom half of those published at The Opening.
His non measurables, instinct, intelligence, work ethic, etc must be all off the charts put him at the very top.
Memphis seems to think they are.
I don't have anything on those data points.


Posted by Adam4LSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2008
13760 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 6:05 pm to
quote:

Brandon Spikes ran a 5.0 and was an all American and a beast in the nfl



hell look at jarvis jones. Dude is expected to be a starter week 1 this season and ran a "shitty" 40 time at the combine.
Posted by whodidthat
Member since Aug 2011
5896 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

ran a "shitty" 40 time at the combine.


At the Georgia pro day. Which is kinda worse since most players have better measurements at their pro day than they do at the combine.
Posted by stptiger
Covington, Louisiana
Member since Feb 2013
158 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 6:38 pm to
Clifton Garrett is a player I want at LSU. Very instinctive player with great tackling skills. His forty time doesnt matter to me. I think they run this without pads.....
Posted by TheWalrus
Member since Dec 2012
40485 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 6:41 pm to
How often is a linebacker running straight ahead? Lateral quickness is much more important.
Posted by Ironhead985
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2013
8727 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 7:09 pm to
I think CG plays a lot faster than any of these "measurables" show. I believe it was already stated in this thread that Jerry Rice was a 4.7 40 guy and I never seen anyone catch him from behind. CG is a straight beast. End of story.
Posted by Stingray
Shreveport
Member since Sep 2007
12420 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 7:21 pm to
Kind of off topic but.... Nitwit is a troll right? I mean his name, he always takes the unpopular view. I might be wrong here, but it seemed obvious to me and I was wondering why yall were even debating him.
Posted by nitwit
Member since Oct 2007
12234 posts
Posted on 7/5/13 at 7:29 pm to
Jerry Rice is one of those guys whose 40 times get slower every year....
It becomes part of the accepted myth.
Bill Walsh writes that Rice's 40 time of 4.59 was considered " marginal" by NFL standards. It was.
I suspect Walsh was in a position to know.
Oh, and it's true I don't shy away from unpopular views.
The bandwagon gets pretty crowded here....
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram