Started By
Message

re: Thoughts: Gordon for Pierce swap

Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:37 am to
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69014 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:37 am to
First, Pierce on the Pelicans roster means nothing. And even if he did play for one year, so what? Watching a great player for one year at the end of his career? You're still essentially trading back to the 16th pick just to dump Gordon. That's crazy talk.

Look, if you just want to dump Gordon by any means necessary (which, imo, is a desperation move that is unwarranted at this point) you can do better than this.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
37235 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:23 am to
No one wants to trade back to the 16th pick. They want to trade Gordon for Pierce and the 16th pick.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69014 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:27 am to
quote:

No one wants to trade back to the 16th pick. They want to trade Gordon for Pierce and the 16th pick.


They amount to the same thing. You just get a shortened contract . . . and, as mentioned earlier, they would buy Pierce out.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
130609 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:33 am to
Yea, Pierce wouldn't play a single second for us.

It would be about dumping Gordon's contract, having more cap space, and the 16th pick as a bonus.

I don't know that cap space really does us more good, unless they really know that Gordon's knee is completely fricked.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
104483 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 10:37 am to
quote:

I don't know that cap space really does us more good, unless they really know that Gordon's knee is completely fricked.


I guess that depends on what our other possibilities are through free agency.

The main 2 I can think of us bringing in as a replacement is Redick, as I see Monta Ellis getting on Monty's bad side through jacking up shots and getting lazy on defense while Iggy will demand too much for a player of his age and our prospects for the next few years.
Posted by Overbrook
Member since May 2013
6410 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 5:22 pm to
That would be trading him for the 16th pick in the draft. Pass.
They should be working on trades, though. They need a 2nd impact young player, but I doubt they'll get it in this draft.
Posted by 42
Member since Apr 2012
3703 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

for all that approve this trade. i give you this Paul Pierce national article that was posted about five hours ago.



That article cites a `national article.' That article is commentary on the real article by a fan.
Posted by JabarkusRussell
Member since Jul 2009
15825 posts
Posted on 5/28/13 at 11:19 pm to
We basically did this deal with Baron Davis for Speedy and trash. No thanks.
Posted by BayouFann
CenLa
Member since Jun 2012
7200 posts
Posted on 5/29/13 at 12:32 am to
quote:

That article cites a `national article.' That article is commentary on the real article by a fan.


oohhhhh......
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram