Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt" - Page 3 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Lsut81
USA Fan
Member since Jun 2005
64236 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

Hell will be known as the greatest ice skating rink before that happens.


I have a feeling he won't respond to my question... Or if he does, there will be a caveat in advance.






Back to top
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
54957 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


Which would be a misstep by Issa because the Court will exonerate her of contempt charges, inasmuch as she rightfully and correctly invoked the Fifth.

It would be a misstep because I don't think Issa really wants Lerner to be publicly exonerated by any Court.






Back to top
CptBengal
USA Fan
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
38537 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

Dershowitz is wrong, IMHO.



Famous Professor at Harvard Law >>>>>>>>>> infinity >>>>> Rex the Furry.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Lsut81
USA Fan
Member since Jun 2005
64236 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

Rex


Still waiting....

Will you admit you were wrong if a Federal Judge says she waved her rights and has to testify?






Back to top
  Replies (0)
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
54957 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

In your masterful opinion how specific does someone have to get for there to be a waiver of rights?

For example... "I did not lie to you when I told you that I had nothing to do with making up the BOLO list." That's specific... she has opened herself up for questioning on that issue... what she told her workers and superiors and Congressmen and when.

This is not merely my opinion.










Back to top
GeauxxxTigers23
USA Fan
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
22435 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


This is a stupid argument. This what people like Rex want. Let's forget the actual reason we're having these hearings so we can argue the minutia of the 5th ammendment. Let's get to the bottom of this and then we can go after this worthless liar.





Back to top
Interception
Providence Fan
Member since Nov 2008
11089 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:


Rogers C.B. Morton (Republican),
Secretary of Commerce November 11, 1975
Subcommittee of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce
Not
considered
Morton released the material to the subcommittee.

Henry Kissinger (Republican),
Secretary of State November 15, 1975
House Select Committee on Intelligence
Not
considered
Citation dismissed after "substantial compliance" with subpoena.

Joseph A. Califano, Jr. (Democrat),
Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare August 6, 1978
Subcommittee of the House Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce
Not
considered
Califano complied with the subpoena about one month after the subcommittee citation.

Charles W. Duncan, Jr. (Democrat),
Secretary of Energy April 29, 1980
Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations
Not
considered
Duncan supplied the material by 14 May 1980.

James B. Edwards (Republican),
Secretary of Energy July 23, 1981
Environment, Energy, and Natural Resources Subcommittee of the House Committee on Government Operations Not
considered Documents were delivered to Congress prior to full Committee consideration of the contempt citation.

James G. Watt (Republican),
Secretary of the Interior February 9, 1982
Subcommittee of House Committee on Energy and Commerce
25 February 1982
House Committee on Energy and Commerce Not
considered
The White House delivered documents to the Rayburn House Office Building for review by Committee members for four hours, providing for no staff or photocopies.

Anne Gorsuch (Republican),
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency December 2, 1982
Oversight Subcommittee of the House Committee on Public Works and Transportation
House Committee on Public Works and Transportation
House of Representatives After legal cases and a court dismissal of the executive Branch's suit, the parties reached an agreement to provide documents.

Rita Lavelle (Republican),
EPA official April 26, 1983
House Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives Indicted for lying to Congress; convicted; sentenced to 6 months in prison, 5 years probation thereafter, and a fine of $10,000

Jack Quinn (Democrat),
White House Counsel
David Watkins,
White House Director of Administration
Matthew Moore, White House aide May 9, 1996
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Not
considered
Subpoenaed documents were provided hours before the House of Representatives was set to consider the contempt citation.

Janet Reno (Democrat),
Attorney General August 6, 1998
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Not
considered
Documents in question were revealed during the impeachment of President Clinton.


Harriet Miers (Republican),
Former White House Counsel
Joshua Bolten (Republican), White House Chief of Staff July 25, 2007
House Committee on the Judiciary[11] February 14, 2008
House of Representatives[12] On March 4, 2009, Miers and former Deputy Chief of Staff to President Bush Karl Rove, agreed to testify under oath before Congress about the firings of U.S. attorneys

Eric Holder (Democrat), Attorney General June 20, 2012
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform[13] June 28, 2012
House of Representatives
Found in criminal[14] and civil[15] contempt






Back to top
  Replies (0)
los angeles tiger
LSU Fan
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

This is not merely my opinion but is the opinion of many of the voices I hear in my head.


FIFY






Back to top
BBONDS25
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2008
16176 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


Rex. Just stop, man. There are good arguments being made on both sides. It is a matter of law that a judge will have to decide. It is not cut and dried not matter how badly you want it to be. You have zero legal education yet you act as though you actually understand the legal arguments and are able to discern which are more persuasive. Color me shocked you fell on the side of not wanting to hear the truth. The worst part is, my gut says she will not be compelled to answer the questions...it does not change the fact that you have no idea what you are talking about.





Back to top
Paluka
LSU Fan
One State Over
Member since Dec 2010
4181 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


Actually, it is!





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Lsut81
USA Fan
Member since Jun 2005
64236 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

los angeles tiger


Told you he wouldn't respond....



And I'm not even saying that he is wrong. Just asking if he would admit he was, since he keeps claiming he is right and a judge will prove it.






Back to top
  Replies (0)
los angeles tiger
LSU Fan
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


Rex doesn't care that people were wrongfully targeted by the government. He loves this government and wants the people he doesn't like put away and is finding every excuse available to insure it happens. If the future brings about a repeat of history, I do hope to be alive to see him put down by the statist rulers and thugs like Lerner. He deserves it.


This post was edited on 5/23 at 2:44 pm


Back to top
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
54957 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

You have zero legal education yet you act as though you actually understand the legal arguments and are able to discern which are more persuasive.

Of course I can. Law is not brain surgery or rocket science. I am not qualified to practice law but I'm certainly qualified to judge for myself what's persuasive or not by reading the applicable laws and applying the circumstances.

What's a pity is that you don't recognize how lame your post is. Its effect would be to stifle any opinion on any legal or Court matter that ever arises on this board. Have an opinion on how the Supreme Court should rule on an issue? Sorry, you've never served there so you have no right to an opinion.






Back to top
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
54957 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

Rex doesn't care that people were wrongfully targeted by the government.

How'd you come up with that? I've said much the opposite here on many occasions.

I'm not a fan of Ms. Lerner. I am a fan, though, of her right to due and fair process.






Back to top
GeauxxxTigers23
USA Fan
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
22435 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

Law is not brain surgery or rocket science


You're right. It's brain science with a little bit of rocket surgery thrown in.



This post was edited on 5/23 at 2:48 pm


Back to top
  Replies (0)
BBONDS25
LSU Fan
Member since Mar 2008
16176 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


No dummy. I never said don't post opinion. I merely stated that there are arguments on both sides of this, and for you to act like its settled makes you look silly. And with questions of law there are certain things a lay person may not understand that a judge does. You speak like you own some authority of knowledge on the subject. You don't know very much about law if you think that is so.





Back to top
los angeles tiger
LSU Fan
1,601 miles from Tiger Stadium
Member since Oct 2003
55976 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

I'm not a fan of Ms. Lerner. I am a fan, though, of her right to due and fair process





What about the right to due and fair process as well as first amendment rights of the tea party people? Your disdain for Citizens United outcome tells me the above is a just another lie of yours that you believe to be true.

I need to find the "cross bricks in the wall" video where you bitched about such "religious symbols" appearing in the bricks of a public school.
Crucifixion is a horrible, tortuous form of death that was used by Persians, Romans and others. Everytime you bitch about such things, you actually are giving them the power you claim that doesn't exist because it's a "fairy tale."



This post was edited on 5/23 at 2:56 pm


Back to top
CajunAngele
LSU Fan
Member since Oct 2012
11168 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

Even if she's innocent of any wrongdoing?


LINK






Back to top
  Replies (0)
GeauxxxTigers23
USA Fan
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
22435 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


Rex only cares about the rights of the people of the revolution.





Back to top
Rex
LSU Fan
Here, there, and nowhere
Member since Sep 2004
54957 posts

re: Alan Dershowitz: "Lerner can be held in contempt"


quote:

I merely stated that there are arguments on both sides of this

I never said otherwise.
quote:

, and for you to act like its settled makes you look silly.

I didn't say it was legally settled. I made predictions based on reading and considering both sides of the argument. As I see it, Ms. Lerner was well within her rights and didn't waive anything. A judge, who is certainly not infallible, will decide.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top