- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/13/13 at 10:56 am to TigerinATL
Real GM floated this trade.
No fricking way it goes down, IMHO, as Jordan is a three-quarter player because he's godawful from the line.
No fricking way it goes down, IMHO, as Jordan is a three-quarter player because he's godawful from the line.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:00 am to TigerinATL
quote:
Off air with Clippers writer, he said he has heard a lot of buzz from FO sources that a Bledsoe/Jordan for EG/Lopez deal could go down
I fricking hope not.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:02 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Jordan is better than Lopez.
No. Jordan is a functional retard that I want nowhere near a young team. The only thing he has on Lopez is athleticism.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:03 am to TigerinATL
I don't know how to feel about this. I like the athleticism of Jordan over Lopez. It makes you think he has more potential at least.
They are the same age with the same years of experience.
Looking at career percentages, Lopez has a 52% FG percentage while Jordan has a 64% FG percentage.
For his career, Lopez has 3.9 rebounds, 1.0 block and 7.2 points a game while Jordan has 6.6 rebounds, 1.5 blocks and 6.7 points per game.
That being said, I don't see how they could make this trade work. It would have to be Gordon and Vasquez or Gordon and Jason Smith with Grant Hill coming over with Jordan and Bledsoe.
After thinking about it, I'd have to do the trade if we could. That's not a bad deal for a guy who hardly ever plays.
They are the same age with the same years of experience.
Looking at career percentages, Lopez has a 52% FG percentage while Jordan has a 64% FG percentage.
For his career, Lopez has 3.9 rebounds, 1.0 block and 7.2 points a game while Jordan has 6.6 rebounds, 1.5 blocks and 6.7 points per game.
That being said, I don't see how they could make this trade work. It would have to be Gordon and Vasquez or Gordon and Jason Smith with Grant Hill coming over with Jordan and Bledsoe.
After thinking about it, I'd have to do the trade if we could. That's not a bad deal for a guy who hardly ever plays.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:03 am to teke184
If they anticipate Davis getting a little bigger, you could close games- last 4 minutes or so with Anderson/Davis. If teams want to hack Jordan early, ill take being in the bonus.
The big issue is what you raised in the Burke/Bledsoe thread- taking on Jordan and then giving Bledsoe a big extension is reckless.
The big issue is what you raised in the Burke/Bledsoe thread- taking on Jordan and then giving Bledsoe a big extension is reckless.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:03 am to Jester
You're probably right, I'm kind of arguing to argue here.
Its just whether dumping Gordon to get Bledsoe is worth the trade off between Jordan/Lopez.
It doesn't work as a trade, anyway.
Its just whether dumping Gordon to get Bledsoe is worth the trade off between Jordan/Lopez.
It doesn't work as a trade, anyway.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:04 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
he is a good shot blocker,
Lopez had more blocks and blocks per minute this season.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:06 am to Fun Bunch
Who cares about Jordan, we could be getting ERICK FREAKING BLEDSOE :six-to-midnight:
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:06 am to teke184
quote:
Real GM floated this trade.
there's the source
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:06 am to corndeaux
quote:
he reminds me of tyson Chandler at this age
I think this is a major insult to Chandler. Chandler took time to develop, but was never considered a stupid player.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:06 am to corndeaux
quote:
When asked what the key has been for taking DeAndre Jordan out of his game in Memphis, Lionel Hollins responded, "What is his game?"
quote:
Lionel Hollins on holding DeAndre Jordan to two rebounds: "Nobody holds anybody to two rebounds. You either get them or you don’t get them."
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:06 am to Fun Bunch
For those complaining about Jordan's rebounding, his is better than Lopez Per 36. Offense isn't as good though.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:08 am to Jester
quote:
Lopez had more blocks and blocks per minute this season.
I was looking at their careers, I didn't even look at each season average.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:09 am to Michael McNamara
quote:
Who cares about Jordan, we could be getting ERICK FREAKING BLEDSOE :six-to-midnight:
So you are still going to post even though you're not McNamara huh.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:09 am to quail man
God, McNamara has no tact at all.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:09 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
I was looking at their careers, I didn't even look at each season average.
Considering that this was the first time Lopez was really given consistent minutes, I think it is probably more indicative of his career. Also, they've both had time to improve their games, so current trajectory would seem important.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:11 am to Suntiger
quote:
It would have to be Gordon and Vasquez or Gordon and Jason Smith with Grant Hill coming over with Jordan and Bledsoe.
After thinking about it, I'd have to do the trade if we could. That's not a bad deal for a guy who hardly ever plays
I have to disagree. Your trade is actually worse than the one in the OP, and even that trade is bad for us.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:13 am to Jester
quote:
Considering that this was the first time Lopez was really given consistent minutes
Irrelevant when looking at the Per 36 stat. His Block stat this year for Per 36 is fairly consistent with his entire career, whether he was getting minutes or not.
Deandre's has been better Per 36 throughout his career. I wouldn't say because he had 2.0 per 36 this year and 3 of the previous 4 years he was much higher says anything about his "trajectory".
Scoring and FT shooting are a completely different argument.
Posted on 5/13/13 at 11:17 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Irrelevant when looking at the Per 36 stat
I totally disagree. More minutes means you get more consistent opportunities and allows you to feel the game out better. Just like really high minutes will end up reducing efficiencies due to fatigue. This is why PER and per 36 must be used within context. 15 minutes against backups is not as challenging per minute as 42 minutes against starters.
Page 2 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News