Supreme Court sides with timber industry, dealing blow to environmentalist - Page 3 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
The Goon
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2008
211 posts

re: Supreme Court sides with timber industry, dealing blow to environmentalist


quote:

Gamble only what you're willing to lose. I used to gamble only the nights tip money. I miss easy cash money.


I worked in a paper mill for a year and read about this case. The EPA wanted to call rain water runoff from timber lands industrial waste. Basically, the environmentalist made up there own law and ran with it. The fact that lower courts agreed on this is embarrassing. Common sense should have prevailed somewhere before the Supreme Court.






Back to top
FalseProphet
LSU Fan
Funroe
Member since Dec 2011
5882 posts
 Online 

re: Supreme Court sides with timber industry, dealing blow to environmentalist


quote:

The EPA wanted to call rain water runoff from timber lands industrial waste


Did you not read my summary of the case one post before yours? The EPA wanted the exact opposite. The environmentalists disagreed.

Arguably the most conservative judge on the Supreme Court would have affirmed the lower courts.






Back to top
The Goon
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Nov 2008
211 posts

re: Supreme Court sides with timber industry, dealing blow to environmentalist


On my phone. I just read your post. The last time I researched this was when a claim was being brought against loggers for run off concerns. The EPA didn't make a ruling yet and the industry didn't know what was going to happen.





Back to top
  Replies (0)
Taxing Authority
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
22347 posts

re: Supreme Court sides with timber industry, dealing blow to environmentalist


quote:

I guess people need to understand the posture of this case.
Apparently so. But your summary represents the tree view.

The forest view... is one of the EPA extending the CWA and CAA far beyond it's legislative design. For example naming CO2 as a pollutant for the purpose of regulating it. This case has the potential to greatly limit such expansions. That is why it was adjudicated. And that is why it indeed is a bitch slap IMV. YMMV.






Back to top
FalseProphet
LSU Fan
Funroe
Member since Dec 2011
5882 posts
 Online 

re: Supreme Court sides with timber industry, dealing blow to environmentalist


I entirely disagree. If anything, this ruling gave the EPA more power to interpret its own regulations. Look for them to exercise that discretion the other way in different cases.

EPA won on two fronts yesterday.






Back to top
  Replies (0)


Back to top