- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
5
Posted on 2/27/13 at 7:20 pm to Lester Earl
quote:Absolutely
We cut roman and will smith, then spend the money saved on guys to replace them?
Posted on 2/27/13 at 7:20 pm to Lester Earl
I doubt we're cutting Roman. I think Smith and Vilma are real possibilities, but I'm not sure how much the staff were counting on them anyway.
Posted on 2/27/13 at 7:20 pm to Lester Earl
The sense comes when you upgrade the talent thus production
Posted on 2/27/13 at 7:24 pm to Lester Earl
wat
How does that not make sense if you get a younger, cheaper, and better option?
How does that not make sense if you get a younger, cheaper, and better option?
This post was edited on 2/27/13 at 7:25 pm
Posted on 2/27/13 at 7:28 pm to Lester Earl
quote:
We cut roman and will smith, then spend the money saved on guys to replace them?
Not sure that makes sense
I never said that, Les.
I'm one of the few that thinks Roman will be in a better spot considering Ryan's scheme. He will be asked to play close to the line more, and that's his best attribute, playing more like a rover. Fine with him being here because of this, but his contract must be adjusted.
For Smith, his contract sucks balls. He obviously has to take way less. Still curious as to what exactly will happen with him.
But if neither are willing to take significantly less, along with Vilma, then adios.
This post was edited on 2/27/13 at 7:30 pm
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News