| Posted by | Message |
GooseSix 
Alabama Fan
Limestone County
Member since Jun 2012
1078 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:17 am to Kashonly)
WOW!
|
| Back to top | |
Peazey 
New Orleans Saints Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2012
1596 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:18 am to Kashonly)
These stories make me sick. If a woman ever comes to me claiming to be pregnant with my child I'm getting a DNA test ASAP.
|
| Back to top | |
fisherbm1112 
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
4065 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:18 am to Kashonly)
He should do his job as he was trained and kill that bitch without mercy. Even though that would leave the child parent less. People like that make me think homicidal thoughts.
|
| Back to top | |
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
58378 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:19 am to Kashonly)
quote:
excepts from court filing: worth the read at least the first 10 pages
Holy shite. 
Guy was kind of a dumbass, but she was an evil stinking bitch...
|
| Back to top | |
yellowfin 
Illinois Fan
Paige is Pretty
Member since May 2006
51749 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:19 am to Kashonly)
never trust a skank named Crystal
|
| Back to top | |
Kashonly
Member since Jan 2006
22114 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:19 am to teke184)
quote:
Steve Nash, for example, divorced his wife shortly after she gave birth to a son because the kid was clearly black and neither he nor his wife was.
never heard this before
link?
|
| Back to top | |
Chef Leppard
Savannah State Fan
:TrillStrong:
Member since Sep 2011
4918 posts
 Online
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:19 am to Layabout)
quote:
You can't get blood from a turnip.
I had a friend several years ago that made this exact same statement in family court one time
Judges exact words ' no, but I can throw a turnip in jail until he comes up with the money'
And he did
|
| Back to top | |
10888bge
LSU Fan
In a good place
Member since Aug 2011
7120 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:20 am to Kashonly)
quote:
Despite Judge Pollack’s strong language, Crystal Parsons has actually filed a motion asking the court to order Brandon to pay $8,535 to the lawyer she hired to defend her lies. This motion is continued to May 9, 2013.
Oh he definitely needs to sue for fraud, and so does the military. Send a message to these remora's and bottom feeders.
|
| Back to top | |
JohnnyKilroy 
North Carolina Fan
Member since Oct 2012
5128 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:20 am to Tmacelroy12)
So this dude has already married a crystal and a jasmine. Da frick is wrong with this dude?
|
| Back to top | |
Catman88
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
36331 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:21 am to Kashonly)
What I dont get is that my cousins had their father beat the shite out of them and their mom. She devorced him finally and she was awarded child support that he never paid for 15 years or so and he is out making a good living with a new wife. Never spent a day in jail even after she went after him for it. But this poor bastard has to pay for another dude's kid?
This post was edited on 2/15 at 10:23 am
|
| Back to top | |
ssgtiger
Member since Jan 2011
952 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:21 am to AUCE05)
quote:
I'm with the judge
Well then you are either a) an idiot or b) a miserable POS.
quote:
Being a bad person is not against the law
No but fraud is
quote:
There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.
He's intend was to raise the kid he thought was his son. WTF are you talking about?
|
| Back to top | |
10888bge
LSU Fan
In a good place
Member since Aug 2011
7120 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:21 am to JohnnyKilroy)
quote:
Da frick is wrong with this dude?
Addicted to hookers?
|
| Back to top | |
geauxjudge
LSU Fan
espn game day crew
Member since Nov 2005
3805 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:23 am to Kashonly)
Another reason not to live in CA.
Another reason to always protect your guns. The one you fight with and the one you f::; with always
As aside. I grant DNA request at anytime.
Here fraud in the inducement and fraud in the factum.
|
| Back to top | |
AngryBeavers
LSU Fan
Member since Jun 2012
1539 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:23 am to Kashonly)
I guess he can appeal?  Where are the OT lawyers?
|
| Back to top | |
yellowfin
Illinois Fan
Paige is Pretty
Member since May 2006
51749 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:24 am to AUCE05)
quote:
There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.
what could his intentions have been?
|
| Back to top | |
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
58378 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:25 am to Kashonly)
quote:
She then began telling me that while I was in Iraq she had been raped.
...and of course the good old rape claim. 
|
| Back to top | |
Tmacelroy12
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
5489 posts
Online
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:25 am to USMCTiger03)
quote:
Guy was kind of a dumbass
Well, if you thought the kid was yours, you would probably do a lot of things that aren't considered wise in retrospect... like marrying this cold-hearted bitch for her to have military benefits. She and her mom should be accused of fraud.
|
| Back to top | |
teke184
LSU Fan
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
5660 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:26 am to Kashonly)
quote:
quote:
Steve Nash, for example, divorced his wife shortly after she gave birth to a son because the kid was clearly black and neither he nor his wife was.
never heard this before
link?
The divorce announcement coming the day after the kid's birth-
LINK /
The rumor mill on the divorce and the kid's parentage-
LINK /
This isn't the only outlet alleging that Jason Richardson was plowing Mrs. Nash and that he's the babydaddy.
|
| Back to top | |
Eighteen
LSU Fan
Member since Dec 2006
15492 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:27 am to Golfer)
quote:
What is the purpose of the law to not accept paternity tests after 24 months?
It's the bull shite "it's in the best interest of the child for you to continue to be his father and support him" line of reasoning.
How our justice system warped into this is beyond me.
The sad part is the mom will probably spend about $500-600 a month max on the kid and rest she will use on herself
This post was edited on 2/15 at 10:29 am
|
| Back to top | |
C
LSU Fan
The Woodlands, TX
Member since Dec 2007
17388 posts
| re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid (Posted on 2/15/13 at 10:32 am to Eighteen)
She's unfit to be a mom. They should take the baby from her and give the soldier the option of keeping the baby as the father or giving it up for adoption.
|
| Back to top | |
