Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid - Page 3 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
StraightCashHomey21
USA Fan
Huntingdon,UK
Member since Jul 2009
48493 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


sad thing is while he is still in he can't just refuse to pay, child support comes right out of your check





Back to top
UpToPar
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
5896 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


It's sad, but the justice system protects a woman and child above everything else. The guy always gets screwed in this situation.





Back to top
BayouFann
New Orleans Saints Fan
North Dallas
Member since Jun 2012
3492 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


frickin san diego. there are tons of these cases there like this. some women out there set on getting sailors and marines on the hook. the courts make money from this so they give no shits about whats right. i'm glad i avoided this cause god knows its kinda hard for a youngin to live in a military town with plenty colleges, beaches, bars, clubs, hookers.........oh wait, i'm over all that shite. i think. anyways tough lick for dude.





Back to top
Kashonly
Iona Fan
Member since Jan 2006
27394 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

If he went Dorner on the judge and the woman, would people support his cause?


You know I would...






Back to top
CocomoLSU
Penn State Fan
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
126627 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

While it's all bullshite, I believe the judges are handcuffed by the laws put in place by the politicians.

Exactly. It's the system and laws in place, although you'd think at some point some judges would realize what's right and make judgments accordingly (assuming they're allowed to).

It's the laws that are fricked up. In most cases of paternity, the world bends over backwards for the mother, no matter how unfit she is and frick over the father no matter how undeserved it is (and to the point of even if he's not the actual father).

Such a fricked up system.






Back to top
BROffshoreTigersWife
LSU Fan
Member since May 2010
2223 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


I hope the kid grows up to hate the mother.





Back to top
Golfer
LSU Fan
Coral Bay, St. John, USVI
Member since Nov 2005
56000 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


What is the purpose of the law to not accept paternity tests after 24 months?





Back to top
CoCo311
LSU Fan
Anyone want my shirt??
Member since Jun 2012
13505 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


This story would be shocking, but the bitches name is CRYSTAL!!!! Never, ever trust a bitch named Crystal. You've been warned.





Back to top
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
62380 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


What an avalanche of shite.

What a heinous creature that bitch is.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 10:13 am


Back to top
Catman88
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
39345 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


So where is the real dad in all of this?





Back to top
CocomoLSU
Penn State Fan
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
126627 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

What is the purpose of the law to not accept paternity tests after 24 months?

Good question. My guess is that they figure after 2 years everyone is on board with who the father is.

But in situations like this when it's clearly not him, and when there is admitted fraud, I have no idea how this judgment can be reached. Also, if I was married and my wife got pregnant, I'm sure I'd assume it was mine like most other normal people would. Thus, no need for a paternity test...and if I found out years later that it wasn't mine (or may not be), that's the first time I'd even remotely consider one.






Back to top
USMCTiger03
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
62380 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

I'm with the judge. He has to look at the legal side of things. Being a bad person is not against the law. There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.

He wasn't raising the child, he was overseas, if I understand correctly.

ETA: I see now after reading more.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 10:21 am


Back to top
CocomoLSU
Penn State Fan
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
126627 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

So where is the real dad in all of this?

Laughing all the way to the bank (with his full, ungarnished paycheck).






Back to top
Kashonly
Iona Fan
Member since Jan 2006
27394 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:


The Court found Crystal Parsons’ testimony to be totally untrustworthy. It called her actions in deliberately lying to Brandon about being the father of the child “despicable.”

Despite Judge Pollack’s strong language, Crystal Parsons has actually filed a motion asking the court to order Brandon to pay $8,535 to the lawyer she hired to defend her lies. This motion is continued to May 9, 2013.


oh forgot this part.






Back to top
ipodking
LSU Fan
Ducking the BRAVE Team
Member since Jun 2008
23515 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


dude got owned





Back to top
CCT
LSU Fan
LA
Member since Dec 2006
3915 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


fricking slut-bitch-whore...may she burn in the hell she probably believes in...

Goddamn rotten cunt.






Back to top
teke184
LSU Fan
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
8045 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Also, if I was married and my wife got pregnant, I'm sure I'd assume it was mine like most other normal people would.


That's usually the case unless the baby clearly isn't from the father.

Steve Nash, for example, divorced his wife shortly after she gave birth to a son because the kid was clearly black and neither he nor his wife was.






Back to top
BROffshoreTigersWife
LSU Fan
Member since May 2010
2223 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

So where is the real dad in all of this?



She probably doesn't know who it is.






Back to top
teke184
LSU Fan
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
8045 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

quote:

So where is the real dad in all of this?



Laughing all the way to the bank (with his full, ungarnished paycheck).


Probably completely unaware that the skank he banged one night has had a kid, let alone that it's his.






Back to top
Tmacelroy12
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
5489 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

So where is the real dad in all of this?

Probably out bangin some other sluzzy, pumped that he doesn't have to pay child support for 12 years.







Back to top


Back to top




//