Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid - Page 2 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Chimlim
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2005
11187 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


That is just awful. That bitch should be deemed an unfit parent.

Why is there a time limit on getting a paternity test? That is the dumbest shite ever.







Back to top
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


If he went Dorner on the judge and the woman, would people support his cause?





Back to top
Upperaltiger06
Auburn Fan
North Alabama
Member since Feb 2012
1894 posts
 Online 

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


Need pic of the woman to determine if worth this.





Back to top
gjackx
LSU Fan
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2007
12350 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

He needs a better lawyer

Nah, just a judge with a clue. What a crock of shit!






Back to top
AUCE05
USA Fan
Member since Dec 2009
10778 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

I realize this, but it's wrong. In every sense of the word, WRONG


I'm with the judge. He has to look at the legal side of things. Being a bad person is not against the law. There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 9:54 am


Back to top
BananaHammock
LSU Fan
Californication
Member since Aug 2011
8423 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


I have no words.





Back to top
RunningBlake
USA Fan
Member since Aug 2011
1898 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


Judge should be hung in public





Back to top
lsuhunt555
Member since Nov 2008
20294 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

why do judges keep protecting these skanks


That's my question. If one of these frickers would put the hammer to her arse then maybe it would happen more often.







Back to top
WikiTiger
LSU Fan
Member since Sep 2007
40721 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

quote:

why do judges keep protecting these skanks




That's my question. If one of these frickers would put the hammer to her arse then maybe it would happen more often.


While it's all bullshite, I believe the judges are handcuffed by the laws put in place by the politicians.






Back to top
waiting4saturday
LSU Fan
Lafayette
Member since Sep 2005
2901 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


frick that judge. Hope he/she gets punished accordingly.





Back to top
AUCE05
USA Fan
Member since Dec 2009
10778 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

While it's all bullshitee, I believe the judges are handcuffed by the laws put in place by the politicians.


I'm sure this womenz was putting off crazy warning signs before this guy married her.






Back to top
lsuhunt555
Member since Nov 2008
20294 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

While it's all bullshite, I believe the judges are handcuffed by the laws put in place by the politicians.



True, but most court cases are based in precedents. Why not be the guy who steps out on this shite and lays the hammer? And yea, it would probably be appealed, but whose to say the appellate judge wouldnt think the same thing? Then bam, you've got your precedent.






Back to top
Tmacelroy12
LSU Fan
Houston
Member since Aug 2012
5489 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

I'm with the judge. He has to look at the legal side of things. Being a bad person is not against the law. There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.

What are you fricking talking about?

I don't know the exact time table, but it seems like she slept with 5+ dudes and got preggers from one of them. Then tricked him into marrying her for his military benefits.

The law protects women in these type situation. There is just too much precedent to overcome sometimes.

I understand the judge was just following the words of the law, but I feel like you should be able to do more than that. No way that you are bound directly from what has come before you, because this is pretty fricked up of this cold-hearted bitch.

We protect maniacal bitches, but not those who fight and die for our country overseas? Frick that






Back to top
mikelbr
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
14323 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:


Paternity tests should be SOP at childbirth. Would clear up a lot of problems.


Man o Man. True story here. My ex1 is an attorney and when she heard ex2 was leaving me for someone else and in a rush to get married she warned me of THIS VERY THING. She said make damned sure that she is NOT pregnant before divorce is final. And if so, have her sign some document and getting DNA tests done.
I wrote it all off and thought nothing of it except to get her to prove she wasn't pregnant before divorce. But frick THIS IS SCARY IT CAN HAPPEN to a man who's wife get's pregnant by another dude!






Back to top
Kashonly
Iona Fan
Member since Jan 2006
27462 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

Need pic of the woman to determine if worth this.


no pic of crystal, but guy is remarried:



Brandon and New Wife Jasmine

I imagine Crystal was a looker too for the guy to have married her.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 10:01 am


Back to top
Golfer
LSU Fan
Coral Bay, St. John, USVI
Member since Nov 2005
56093 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.


What are you talking about?






Back to top
FlukerFlakes
Alabama Fan
Member since Sep 2012
1940 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid








Back to top
Catman88
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Dec 2004
39348 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

He should sue her for fraud. I bet the jury would award him more than $1377 per month.


Hmmm

So if you were awarded say 1377 a month after you were forced to pay the person 1377 a month in child support. Would you be taxed on the 1377 that you get back that you already gave as new income? Would the deduction on the payment even it out or would you be screwed again by uncle same?






Back to top
sweetbobber
LSU Fan
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2012
268 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

If he went Dorner on the judge and the woman, would people support his cause?


Yes, yes it would

In fact, unfortunately it took several high profile suicides from divorced dads for the courts to start being more fair with custody.

These fathers had their lives ruined by women and were unable to see their children because of the unfair custody laws and ignorant family judges. They lost their children, their homes, everything. They were busting their asses every day only to be forced to support a woman who left them and took everything. They said F it and committed suicide. Now the bitches get nothing and sadly the children are left without a father.



This post was edited on 2/15 at 10:04 am


Back to top
crimsonsaint
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Nov 2009
31498 posts

re: Woman purposefully cons Soldier, judge says he has to pay $1,377 month for kid


quote:

I'm with the judge. He has to look at the legal side of things.


What the frick is legal about forcing someone to pay $1800 a month for 18 years for someone else's kid? That's almost $400,000!!!

quote:

There's no way the judge can know the intent of the father when raising that child those two years.


Do what?






Back to top


Back to top




//